Urbani Lucio, Mazzoni Alessandro, De Simone Paolo, Catalano Gabriele, Coletti Laura, Petruccelli Stefania, Biancofiore Gianni, Bindi Lucia, Scatena Fabrizio, Filipponi Franco
Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy.
J Clin Apher. 2007;22(4):187-94. doi: 10.1002/jca.20111.
The aim of this work is to report on the results of a single-center, prospective study on the feasibility of calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-staggered immunosuppression by use of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in liver transplant (LT) recipients at risk of renal and neurological complications. Patients were matched on a 1:1 basis with historical controls on standard CNI immunosuppression. ECP patients were treated with ECP plus antimetabolites and/or steroids, while CNIs were withheld until clinically indicated. Thirty-six patients were evaluated: 18 ECP patients and 18 controls. ECP was tolerated in 100% of cases. CNI were introduced at a median of 8 days (4-55) in 17 ECP patients, while one patient was on a fully CNI-sparing regimen 22 months after LT. Acute rejection occurred in 27.7% patients in ECP (5/18) versus 16.7% in controls (3/18) (P = ns) with a shorter time to rejection in ECP (36 +/- 31.3 days vs. 83.6 +/- 65.6 days; P = ns). All rejection episodes were amenable to medical treatment. Neurological and renal complications occurred in 22.2% (4/18) of patients in either group, but led to in-hospital mortality in 3 patients among controls versus 1 in ECP (P = ns). One-, 6-, and 12-month survival rates were 94.4, 88.1, and 88.1% in ECP versus 94.4, 77.7, and 72.2% among controls (P < 0.0001). ECP seems to allow for management of high-risk LT recipients in the early post-transplant course and reduction of CNI-related mortality. Continued data validation is favored to assess the impact of ECP on long-term graft and patient survival.
这项工作的目的是报告一项单中心前瞻性研究的结果,该研究针对肝移植(LT)受者中存在肾脏和神经并发症风险的患者,采用体外光化学疗法(ECP)进行钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)延迟免疫抑制的可行性。患者按1:1比例与接受标准CNI免疫抑制的历史对照进行匹配。接受ECP治疗的患者接受ECP加抗代谢药物和/或类固醇治疗,而CNI在临床指征出现前停用。共评估了36例患者:18例接受ECP治疗的患者和18例对照。100%的病例对ECP耐受。17例接受ECP治疗的患者中,CNI的引入时间中位数为8天(4 - 55天),而1例患者在LT后22个月采用完全不使用CNI的方案。接受ECP治疗的患者中有27.7%(5/18)发生急性排斥反应,而对照组为16.7%(3/18)(P = 无统计学意义),ECP组的排斥反应发生时间更短(36 ± 31.3天 vs. 83.6 ± 65.6天;P = 无统计学意义)。所有排斥反应均可用药物治疗。两组患者中均有22.2%(4/18)发生神经和肾脏并发症,但对照组中有3例患者因此导致住院死亡,而ECP组为1例(P = 无统计学意义)。接受ECP治疗的患者1个月、6个月和12个月的生存率分别为94.4%、88.1%和88.1%,而对照组分别为94.4%、77.7%和72.2%(P < 0.0001)。ECP似乎有助于在移植后早期管理高风险的LT受者,并降低与CNI相关的死亡率。持续的数据验证有助于评估ECP对长期移植物和患者生存的影响。