Stice Eric, Presnell Katherine, Gau Jeff, Shaw Heather
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Feb;75(1):20-32. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.20.
The authors investigated mediators hypothesized to account for the effects of 2 eating disorder prevention programs using data from 355 adolescent girls who were randomized to a dissonance or a healthy weight intervention or an active control condition. The dissonance intervention produced significant reductions in outcomes (body dissatisfaction, dieting, negative affect, bulimic symptoms) and the mediator (thin-ideal internalization), change in the mediator correlated with change in outcomes and usually occurred before change in outcomes, and intervention effects became significantly weaker when change in the mediator was partialed, providing support for the hypothesized mediators and this new approach to testing mediation in randomized trials. Findings provide somewhat less support for the hypothesis that change in healthy eating and exercise would mediate the healthy weight intervention effects.
作者们利用来自355名青春期女孩的数据,对被认为可解释两种饮食失调预防项目效果的中介因素进行了调查。这些女孩被随机分配到认知失调干预组、健康体重干预组或积极对照组。认知失调干预显著降低了相关结果(身体不满、节食、消极情绪、暴食症状)以及中介因素(对瘦理想的内化),中介因素的变化与结果的变化相关,且通常在结果变化之前发生。当排除中介因素的变化时,干预效果显著减弱,这为假设的中介因素以及这种在随机试验中检验中介作用的新方法提供了支持。研究结果对健康饮食和运动的变化会介导健康体重干预效果这一假设的支持力度稍小。