Stice Eric, Shaw Heather, Burton Emily, Wade Emily
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;74(2):263-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.263.
In this trial, adolescent girls with body dissatisfaction (N = 481, M age = 17 years) were randomized to an eating disorder prevention program involving dissonance-inducing activities that reduce thin-ideal internalization, a prevention program promoting healthy weight management, an expressive writing control condition, or an assessment-only control condition. Dissonance participants showed significantly greater reductions in eating disorder risk factors and bulimic symptoms than healthy weight, expressive writing, and assessment-only participants, and healthy weight participants showed significantly greater reductions in risk factors and symptoms than expressive writing and assessment-only participants from pretest to posttest. Although these effects faded over 6-month and 12-month follow-ups, dissonance and healthy weight participants showed significantly lower binge eating and obesity onset and reduced service utilization through 12-month follow-up, suggesting that both interventions have public health potential.
在这项试验中,对存在身体意象不满的青春期女孩(N = 481,平均年龄 = 17岁)进行随机分组,分别参加一项饮食失调预防项目,该项目包含减少对瘦理想的内化的认知失调诱导活动;一项促进健康体重管理的预防项目;一个表达性写作对照条件组;或一个仅作评估的对照条件组。与健康体重组、表达性写作组和仅作评估组的参与者相比,认知失调组参与者在饮食失调风险因素和暴食症状方面的减少更为显著。从测试前到测试后,健康体重组参与者在风险因素和症状方面的减少比表达性写作组和仅作评估组的参与者更为显著。尽管这些效果在6个月和12个月的随访中逐渐消失,但认知失调组和健康体重组参与者在12个月的随访中显示出显著更低的暴饮暴食和肥胖发生率,以及更低的服务利用率,这表明这两种干预措施都具有公共卫生潜力。