• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷走神经刺激疗法后的疗效评估:一种新分类法的提议

Outcome measurement after vagal nerve stimulation therapy: proposal of a new classification.

作者信息

McHugh John C, Singh Harsh W, Phillips Jack, Murphy Kevin, Doherty Colin P, Delanty Norman

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Beaumount Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2007 Feb;48(2):375-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00931.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00931.x
PMID:17295633
Abstract

PURPOSE

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive palliative therapy for refractory epilepsy. Effects of treatment are varied and some, such as the use of an external magnet for seizure termination, are unique to VNS. No accepted standard exists for outcome measurement after VNS treatment. We present a novel classification for outcome, which includes assessment of both seizure frequency and severity in VNS-treated patients.

METHODS

We devised a classification system modeled on the Engel classification for surgically treated patients, but tailored for use in VNS therapy, which incorporates five classes of outcome. We retrospectively reviewed VNS-treated patients in our centre, and used the data to illustrate our system and compare it with the Engel model.

RESULTS

With this system, 48 patients (mean age, 30 years) were followed up over a median of 18 months. Seventy-eight percent had partial epilepsy. Sixteen and a half percent experienced class I outcome (>80% seizure-frequency reduction). Twenty percent had class II improvement (50-79% seizure-frequency reduction). One-third had no improvement (class V). The remaining patients comprised class III (seizure-frequency reduction <50%) or class IV (magnet benefit alone) outcomes. Class I-III outcomes were further subdivided according to effects on ictal or postictal severity.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a new classification, which can be used for all epilepsies and which reflects outcome measures beyond seizure-frequency reduction alone. Use of this system would allow greater comparison between future studies of VNS therapy.

摘要

目的

迷走神经刺激(VNS)是难治性癫痫的一种辅助姑息治疗方法。治疗效果各不相同,其中一些,如使用外部磁铁终止癫痫发作,是VNS所特有的。VNS治疗后尚无公认的疗效评估标准。我们提出了一种新的疗效分类方法,该方法包括对接受VNS治疗患者的癫痫发作频率和严重程度的评估。

方法

我们设计了一种分类系统,该系统以用于手术治疗患者的恩格尔分类为模型,但针对VNS治疗进行了调整,纳入了五类疗效。我们回顾性分析了本中心接受VNS治疗的患者,并使用这些数据来说明我们的系统,并将其与恩格尔模型进行比较。

结果

使用该系统,对48例患者(平均年龄30岁)进行了中位时间为18个月的随访。78%的患者患有部分性癫痫。16.5%的患者达到I类疗效(癫痫发作频率降低>80%)。20%的患者有II类改善(癫痫发作频率降低50 - 79%)。三分之一的患者无改善(V类)。其余患者为III类(癫痫发作频率降低<50%)或IV类(仅磁铁有益)疗效。I - III类疗效根据对发作期或发作后期严重程度的影响进一步细分。

结论

我们提出了一种新的分类方法,可用于所有癫痫类型,且能反映除癫痫发作频率降低之外的疗效指标。使用该系统将有助于未来VNS治疗研究之间进行更大程度的比较。

相似文献

1
Outcome measurement after vagal nerve stimulation therapy: proposal of a new classification.迷走神经刺激疗法后的疗效评估:一种新分类法的提议
Epilepsia. 2007 Feb;48(2):375-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00931.x.
2
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a Belgian multicenter study.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫:一项比利时多中心研究。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007 Sep;11(5):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
4
[Vagal nerve stimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy].[迷走神经刺激术治疗儿童耐药性癫痫]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Mar 23;126(7):896-8.
5
[Long-term efficiency of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in non-surgical refractory epilepsies in adolescents and adults].[迷走神经刺激术(VNS)对青少年及成人非手术难治性癫痫的长期疗效]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2007 Dec;163(12):1169-77. doi: 10.1016/S0035-3787(07)78401-1.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: long term efficacy and side-effects.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫:长期疗效和副作用
Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Jan;117(1):58-61.
7
Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy.迷走神经刺激疗法对难治性癫痫患者的长期疗效。
J Clin Neurosci. 2008 Feb;15(2):127-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.07.083.
8
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.儿童难治性癫痫的迷走神经刺激:迷走神经刺激的作用不止于降低癫痫发作频率。
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
9
Efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with medically refractory epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫患儿的疗效
Neurosurgery. 2000 Dec;47(6):1353-7; discussion 1357-8.
10
Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for refractory epilepsy in humans.右侧迷走神经刺激作为人类难治性癫痫的一种治疗方法。
Epilepsia. 2005 Jan;46(1):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.16404.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term efficacy and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a multicenter cohort study.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫的长期疗效及预测因素:一项多中心队列研究
Acta Epileptol. 2025 Sep 1;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42494-025-00220-8.
2
Long-Term Outcome of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫的长期疗效
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2025 Jan 1;28(1):32-37. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_389_24. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Long-term effects of vagus nerve stimulation on EEG aperiodic components in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.
迷走神经刺激对耐药性癫痫患者脑电图非周期性成分的长期影响。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Sep 25;17:17562864241279124. doi: 10.1177/17562864241279124. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Scoping Review.迷走神经刺激术治疗Lennox-Gastaut综合征的疗效与安全性:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;11(8):905. doi: 10.3390/children11080905.
5
Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy With Right-Sided Vagus Nerve Stimulation.右侧迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫
Cureus. 2024 Jul 21;16(7):e65061. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65061. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Analysis of factors influencing the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in children and prediction model for efficacy evaluation.影响儿童迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫疗效的因素分析及疗效评估预测模型
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1321245. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1321245. eCollection 2024.
7
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Children-A Literature Review.儿童耐药性癫痫的迷走神经刺激疗法——文献综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):780. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030780.
8
Norwegian population-based study of effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.挪威一项基于人群的研究:迷走神经刺激对发育性和癫痫性脑病患者的疗效。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Apr;9(2):704-716. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12908. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Role of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Refractory and Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Pediatric Case Series.迷走神经刺激在难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态中的作用:一项儿科病例系列研究
Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 14;13(11):1589. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111589.
10
Effect of vagus nerve stimulation against generalized seizure and status epilepticus recurrence.迷走神经刺激对全身性癫痫发作和癫痫持续状态复发的影响。
Front Neurol. 2023 Sep 15;14:1258854. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1258854. eCollection 2023.