• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫的长期疗效及预测因素:一项多中心队列研究

Long-term efficacy and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a multicenter cohort study.

作者信息

Tan Bojing, Liu Yuye, Gong Mingkun, Meng Fangang, Yang Anchao, Zhang Kai, Sang Lin, Zhang Jianguo

机构信息

Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100020, China.

出版信息

Acta Epileptol. 2025 Sep 1;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42494-025-00220-8.

DOI:10.1186/s42494-025-00220-8
PMID:40887667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12400741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, a number of indicators have been analyzed for the relationship with the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients, but there is still no definite predictor of efficacy. This study is to assess the long-term effectiveness and predictors of VNS in DRE patients.

METHODS

We analyzed DRE patients monitored for over a year post-surgery (2016-2019) to evaluate VNS outcomes. Logistic regression was used to identify efficacy predictors.

RESULTS

Out of 162 DRE patients with VNS, 99 were followed for over 12 months, 80 for over 24 months, and 70 for over 36 months. At 12 months, 33 (33.4%) showed effectiveness, including 7 (7.1%) who were seizure-free. At 24 months, 32 (40.0%) were effective, including 12 (15.0%) who were seizure-free. At 36 months, 36 (51.4%) were effective, including 11 (15.7%) who were seizure-free. After 5 years, 27 (55.1%) were effective, including 8 (16.3%) who were seizure-free. Multivariate regression analysis identified structural etiology as a predictive factor for the effective VNS treatment (P = 0.039, OR = 0.35 [0.13-0.95]).

CONCLUSIONS

VNS effectively controls seizures, with effectiveness and seizure-free rates improving over time. Patients with structural factors are at higher risk of ineffective VNS, suggesting epilepsy etiology may predict VNS outcomes.

摘要

背景

目前,已对多项指标与迷走神经刺激术(VNS)治疗耐药性癫痫(DRE)患者疗效的关系进行了分析,但仍没有明确的疗效预测指标。本研究旨在评估VNS治疗DRE患者的长期疗效及疗效预测指标。

方法

我们分析了术后接受一年以上监测(2016 - 2019年)的DRE患者,以评估VNS的治疗效果。采用逻辑回归分析来确定疗效预测指标。

结果

162例接受VNS治疗的DRE患者中,99例随访超过12个月,80例随访超过24个月,70例随访超过36个月。12个月时,33例(33.4%)显示有效,其中7例(7.1%)无癫痫发作。24个月时,32例(40.0%)有效,其中12例(15.0%)无癫痫发作。36个月时,36例(51.4%)有效,其中11例(15.7%)无癫痫发作。5年后,27例(55.1%)有效,其中8例(16.3%)无癫痫发作。多因素回归分析确定结构病因是VNS治疗有效的预测因素(P = 0.039,OR = 0.35 [0.13 - 0.95])。

结论

VNS能有效控制癫痫发作,且有效率和无癫痫发作率随时间推移而提高。存在结构因素的患者VNS治疗无效的风险较高,提示癫痫病因可能预测VNS的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6e/12400741/a3a83f7e154d/42494_2025_220_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6e/12400741/bc812a53141b/42494_2025_220_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6e/12400741/a3a83f7e154d/42494_2025_220_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6e/12400741/bc812a53141b/42494_2025_220_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6e/12400741/a3a83f7e154d/42494_2025_220_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term efficacy and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a multicenter cohort study.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫的长期疗效及预测因素:一项多中心队列研究
Acta Epileptol. 2025 Sep 1;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42494-025-00220-8.
2
Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.迷走神经刺激治疗部分性癫痫发作。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 3;2015(4):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.pub2.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation for focal seizures.迷走神经刺激治疗局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 14;7(7):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.pub3.
4
Retention rate of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-centre, retrospective study.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫的保留率:单中心回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Jul;203:107383. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107383. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
The effect of Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on seizure control, cognitive function, and quality of life in individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review article.迷走神经刺激(VNS)对耐药性癫痫患者癫痫控制、认知功能及生活质量的影响:一篇系统综述文章。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Dec;9(6):2101-2111. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13066. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
6
The role of vagus nerve stimulation in genetic etiologies of drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis.迷走神经刺激在耐药性癫痫遗传病因中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 Mar 18;29(6):667-680. doi: 10.3171/2022.1.PEDS222. Print 2022 Jun 1.
7
A pilot study on the programming protocol of vagus nerve stimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: High pulse amplitude or high duty cycle.耐药性癫痫患儿迷走神经刺激编程方案的初步研究:高脉冲幅度还是高占空比。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Jun;10(3):831-841. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70043. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
8
The Effectiveness of Cenobamate in Patients Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug Resistant Epilepsy.氯巴占在接受迷走神经刺激治疗的耐药性癫痫患者中的有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70229. doi: 10.1111/ene.70229.
9
Reduction of generalized tonic-clonic seizures following vagus nerve stimulation therapy: CORE-VNS Study 24-month follow-up.迷走神经刺激疗法后全身强直阵挛性发作的减少:CORE-VNS研究24个月随访
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul;66(7):2307-2314. doi: 10.1111/epi.18371. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
10
Safety profile of intracranial neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in children.儿童耐药性癫痫颅内神经调节的安全性概况
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2025 May 2;36(1):36-44. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.PEDS24463. Print 2025 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Implantation as a Main Predictor of Response to Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Childhood-Onset Refractory Epilepsy.早期植入物是儿童期耐药性癫痫迷走神经刺激反应的主要预测因子。
J Child Neurol. 2021 Apr;36(5):365-370. doi: 10.1177/0883073820974855. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Diagnosis and Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Present and Future Perspectives.耐药性癫痫的诊断与治疗:现状与未来展望
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 26;10(11):779. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110779.
3
Epilepsy duration as an independent predictor of response to vagus nerve stimulation.
癫痫持续时间是迷走神经刺激反应的独立预测因子。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Nov;167:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106432. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
4
Classification of paroxysmal events and the four-dimensional epilepsy classification system.发作性事件的分类及四维癫痫分类系统
Epileptic Disord. 2019 Feb 1;21(1):1-29. doi: 10.1684/epd.2019.1033.
5
ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology.国际抗癫痫联盟癫痫分类:国际抗癫痫联盟分类与术语委员会立场文件
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):512-521. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
6
Rates and Predictors of Seizure Freedom With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫的无癫痫发作率及预测因素
Neurosurgery. 2016 Sep;79(3):345-53. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001165.
7
Vagus nerve stimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: age at implantation and shorter duration of epilepsy as predictors of better efficacy?迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫患儿:植入时年龄及癫痫病程较短能否作为疗效更佳的预测指标?
Epileptic Disord. 2015 Sep;17(3):308-14. doi: 10.1684/epd.2015.0768.
8
Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.迷走神经刺激治疗部分性癫痫发作。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 3;2015(4):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.pub2.
9
Electrical stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: an evidence-based analysis.药物难治性癫痫的电刺激:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Oct 1;13(18):1-37. eCollection 2013.
10
Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in posttraumatic versus nontraumatic epilepsy.迷走神经刺激治疗创伤后与非创伤性癫痫的疗效。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Nov;117(5):970-7. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.JNS122. Epub 2012 Sep 14.