• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

α受体阻滞剂治疗输尿管结石的疗效

Efficacy of alpha-blockers for the treatment of ureteral stones.

作者信息

Parsons J Kellogg, Hergan Lori Ann, Sakamoto Kyoko, Lakin Charles

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California 92103, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):983-7; discussion 987. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.023
PMID:17296392
Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined if alpha-blocker therapy promotes expulsion of ureteral stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Meta-analysis was performed of randomized clinical trials of alpha-blockers for the treatment of ureteral stones. The primary outcome was overall stone expulsion rate. Risk ratios and risk differences were estimated using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models.

RESULTS

Eleven trials (911 participants) met inclusion criteria for this study. Pooled analysis demonstrated significantly increased rates of stone expulsion with alpha-blocker therapy. Compared to patients receiving conservative therapy only, patients receiving conservative therapy plus alpha-blockers were 44% more likely to spontaneously expel the stones (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.59, p<0.001), and stone expulsion incidence increased significantly (RD 0.28, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.34, p<0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses categorized by specific alpha-blocker, prior use of shock wave lithotripsy and stone size produced similar effect estimates, but were generally less precise due to smaller sample sizes. The largest subgroup of trials (664 participants) studied tamsulosin without prior shock wave lithotripsy (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.58; RD 0.29, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

alpha-Blocker therapy is associated with significantly increased rates of distal ureteral stone expulsion.

摘要

目的

我们确定α受体阻滞剂疗法是否能促进输尿管结石排出。

材料与方法

对α受体阻滞剂治疗输尿管结石的随机临床试验进行荟萃分析。主要结局是总体结石排出率。采用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型估计风险比和风险差异。

结果

11项试验(911名参与者)符合本研究的纳入标准。汇总分析表明,α受体阻滞剂疗法显著提高了结石排出率。与仅接受保守治疗的患者相比,接受保守治疗加α受体阻滞剂的患者自发排出结石的可能性高44%(风险比1.44,95%置信区间1.31至1.59,p<0.001),结石排出发生率显著增加(风险差异0.28,95%置信区间0.22至0.34,p<0.001)。按特定α受体阻滞剂、既往是否使用冲击波碎石术和结石大小进行的敏感性和亚组分析产生了相似的效应估计值,但由于样本量较小,通常不太精确。最大的试验亚组(664名参与者)研究了未接受过冲击波碎石术的坦索罗辛(风险比1.44,95%置信区间1.32至1.58;风险差异0.29,95%置信区间0.23至0.35)。

结论

α受体阻滞剂疗法与远端输尿管结石排出率显著增加相关。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of alpha-blockers for the treatment of ureteral stones.α受体阻滞剂治疗输尿管结石的疗效
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):983-7; discussion 987. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.023.
2
alpha-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.α受体阻滞剂辅助体外冲击波碎石术后排石:一项荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(2):256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09014.x. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
3
Pharmacologic expulsive treatment of ureteral calculi.输尿管结石的药物排石治疗
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1361-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G586. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
4
Adjunctive medical therapy with an alpha-1A-specific blocker after shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteral stones.输尿管下段结石冲击波碎石术后使用α-1A特异性阻滞剂的辅助药物治疗。
Urol Int. 2009;82(2):166-9. doi: 10.1159/000200793. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
5
Comparison of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treating distal ureteral stones.坦索罗辛与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Apr 5;122(7):798-801.
6
Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?坦索罗辛在肾和输尿管结石的冲击波碎石术中是否有作用?
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.160.
7
Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.坦索罗辛在治疗7毫米及以下远端输尿管结石中是否有作用?一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
8
A systematic review of medical therapy to facilitate passage of ureteral calculi.促进输尿管结石排出的药物治疗系统评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;50(5):552-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.015. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
9
Does tamsulosin enhance lower ureteral stone clearance with or without shock wave lithotripsy?坦索罗辛在有或没有冲击波碎石术的情况下是否能提高输尿管下段结石的清除率?
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.020.
10
Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:100 例患者随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of Silodosin as medical expulsive therapy after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients ‍‍with renal stones.西洛多辛用于小儿肾结石患者冲击波碎石术后药物排石治疗的安全性和有效性
Urolithiasis. 2025 May 20;53(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01760-x.
2
Efficacy of the combination of tadalafil and tamsulosin versus tadalafil alone as a medical expulsive therapy for stone L1/3 ureter 10 mm or less: A prospective comparative placebo-controlled study.他达拉非与坦索罗辛联合用药与单独使用他达拉非作为10毫米及以下L1/3段输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效:一项前瞻性、比较性、安慰剂对照研究。
Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):278-282. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000206. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Pooled-analysis of tadalafil and tamsulosin for ureteral calculi.
他达拉非与坦索罗辛治疗输尿管结石的荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 30;15:1351312. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1351312. eCollection 2024.
4
Silodosin versus Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy of Ureteral Stones: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.西洛多辛与坦索罗辛用于输尿管结石的药物排石治疗:一项更新的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 6;58(12):1794. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121794.
5
Tamsulosin attenuates high glucose- induced injury in glomerular endothelial cells.坦索罗辛可减轻高糖诱导的肾小球内皮细胞损伤。
Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):5184-5194. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1955527.
6
Does silodosin offer better results than tamsulosin as medical expulsive treatment after shock wave lithotripsy for single distal ureteric stones?对于单个远端输尿管结石,在冲击波碎石术后,西洛多辛作为药物排石治疗比坦索罗辛效果更好吗?
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Dec;15(4):602-607. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.92307. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
Adjunctive medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin for repeated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助坦索罗辛药物排石疗法治疗体外冲击波碎石术后复发肾结石:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):23-35. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0093.
8
Efficacy of Tamsulosin plus Tadalafil versus Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial.坦索罗辛联合他达拉非与坦索罗辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Adv Urol. 2020 Jan 29;2020:4347598. doi: 10.1155/2020/4347598. eCollection 2020.
9
Association between serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional study of Chinese male population.血清高敏 C 反应蛋白水平与勃起功能障碍的关系:中国男性人群的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 11;9(1):5929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42342-3.
10
Urolithiasis in the pediatric population - current opinion on epidemiology, patophysiology, diagnostic evaluation and treatment.儿童人群中的尿石症——关于流行病学、病理生理学、诊断评估及治疗的当前观点
Dev Period Med. 2018;22(2):201-208. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20182202.201208.