• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:100 例患者随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。

Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073
PMID:20109697
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of tamsulosin on the rate of spontaneous passage of distal ureteral stones.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with stones sized 10 mm or smaller, located in the distal part of the ureter were included. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups. Group 1 received 0.4 mg tamsulosin once daily and group 2 received placebo. The investigators and the patients were masked to the type of treatment. Patients were followed-up until passage of the stone, or for a maximum of 4 weeks. The number of pain episodes, need for analgesia, stone expulsion rate and time, and possible side effects of medications were observed in both groups.

RESULTS

Apart from 4 patients in the placebo group who were lost to follow-up, all patients complied with the prescribed medications and continued the study. Stone expulsion occurred in 41 of 50 patients (82%) in group 1 and in 28 of 46 patients (61%) in group 2 (P = .02). The chance of stone expulsion was 3 times higher in the tamsulosin group (relative risk [RR] = 2.93; 95% CI, 1.152-7.45). In group 1, patients with stones sized < or = 5 mm showed a significantly higher expulsion rate compared to those with larger stones (> 5 mm). Age, gender, and stone laterality had no significant impact on the expulsion rate. The expulsion time was significantly shorter in the tamsulosin group (6.4 +/- 2.77 days vs 9.87 +/- 5.4 days for groups 1 and 2, respectively). Moreover, the frequency of pain episodes, the need for diclofenac, and its total dosage were significantly lower in the tamsulosin group. Side effects observed in both groups were comparable and mild, and no patient withdrew because of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamsulosin is a safe and effective drug that enhances spontaneous passage of distal ureteral stones sized 10 mm or smaller.

摘要

目的

研究坦索罗辛对输尿管下段结石自行排出率的影响。

方法

共纳入 100 例结石大小为 10mm 或以下、位于输尿管下段的患者。患者被随机分为两组,每组 50 例。第 1 组患者每日服用坦索罗辛 0.4mg,第 2 组患者服用安慰剂。研究者和患者均对治疗类型设盲。两组患者均随访至结石排出或最长 4 周。观察两组患者的疼痛发作次数、镇痛需求、结石排出率和时间,以及药物的可能不良反应。

结果

除安慰剂组 4 例患者失访外,所有患者均按规定服药并继续研究。第 1 组 50 例患者中有 41 例(82%)结石排出,第 2 组 46 例患者中有 28 例(61%)结石排出(P=0.02)。坦索罗辛组结石排出的几率是安慰剂组的 3 倍(相对危险度 [RR]=2.93;95%可信区间,1.152-7.45)。第 1 组中结石大小≤5mm 的患者排出率明显高于结石大小>5mm 的患者。年龄、性别和结石侧别对排出率无显著影响。坦索罗辛组的排出时间明显缩短(6.4±2.77 天比 1 组和 2 组分别为 9.87±5.4 天)。此外,坦索罗辛组疼痛发作次数、双氯芬酸需求及其总剂量均明显减少。两组的不良反应相似且均较轻,无患者因不良反应退出。

结论

坦索罗辛是一种安全有效的药物,可促进 10mm 或以下输尿管下段结石的自然排出。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:100 例患者随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073.
2
Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.坦索罗辛在治疗7毫米及以下远端输尿管结石中是否有作用?一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
3
Tamsulosin to treat uncomplicated distal ureteral calculi: a double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.坦索罗辛治疗单纯性远端输尿管结石:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。
Can J Urol. 2010 Jun;17(3):5178-83.
4
Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of alfuzosin and tamsulosin in management of lower ureteral stones.比较阿夫唑嗪和坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石疗效的前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):706-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
5
Efficacy of tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi.坦索罗辛在远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗中的疗效。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(1):59-62. doi: 10.1080/00365590701571076. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
6
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of use of tamsulosin and/or tolterodine for medical treatment of distal ureteral stones.坦索罗辛和/或托特罗定用于药物治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效比较评估
Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.009.
7
Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi.坦索罗辛、硝苯地平与间苯三酚用于远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗疗效的随机试验
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):167-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161600.54732.86.
8
Does tamsulosin enhance lower ureteral stone clearance with or without shock wave lithotripsy?坦索罗辛在有或没有冲击波碎石术的情况下是否能提高输尿管下段结石的清除率?
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.020.
9
Nifedipine versus tamsulosin for the management of lower ureteral stones.硝苯地平与坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较
J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):568-71. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132390.61756.ff.
10
Tamsulosin for ureteral stones in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial.坦索罗辛用于急诊科输尿管结石治疗:一项随机对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;54(3):432-9, 439.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.026. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
L-arginine role for stone lower ureter: A randomized controlled trial.L-精氨酸对输尿管下段结石的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 11;53(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01768-3.
2
Alpha-blockers: the magic pill for endourology-The great delusion.α受体阻滞剂:腔内泌尿外科的“神奇药丸”——一个巨大的误区。
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 29;42(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04785-w.
3
Efficacy of sexual intercosurse in the spontaneous passage of distal or intramural ureteral stones: a randomsized controlled trial.性交对远端或壁内输尿管结石自然排出的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Nov 1;85(12):5972-5976. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001414. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.三种常用α受体阻滞剂作为医学排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Sep-Oct;48(5):742-759. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0548.
5
Evaluation of the efficacy of masturbation on distal ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.评估自慰对远端输尿管结石疗效的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Apr;53(4):655-660. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02672-y. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
The evaluation of the effectiveness of Gilaburu (Viburnum opulus L.) extract in the medical expulsive treatment of distal ureteral stones.吉拉布鲁(欧洲荚蒾)提取物在远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗中的疗效评估。
Turk J Urol. 2019 Dec;45(Supp. 1):S63-S69. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.23463. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Is tamsulosin effective for the passage of symptomatic ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.坦索罗辛对有症状输尿管结石的排出是否有效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(10):e14796. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014796.
8
Comparing tamsulosin, silodosin versus silodosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: A randomised trial.坦索罗辛、西洛多辛与西洛多辛联合他达拉非作为下输尿管结石药物排石疗法的比较:一项随机试验。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Dec 24;16(2):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.012. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.α受体阻滞剂作为输尿管结石的药物排石疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD008509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008509.pub3.
10
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效比较。
Urol Ann. 2018 Jan-Mar;10(1):82-86. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_36_17.