Suppr超能文献

一项关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在高血压中比较疗效的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.

机构信息

3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension-24h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Center, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Mar;33(3):188-201. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0138-y. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are drugs commonly used for the treatment of hypertension. However, studies on their comparative efficacy have not been extensively investigated. The current systematic review and network meta-analysis studied the comparative efficacy of the two antihypertensive treatment categories in reducing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension patients. A literature search was carried out in Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trials, which had reported blood pressure effects, mortality, and/or morbidity. Blood pressure results were found in 30 studies with 7370 participants and 8 studies with 25,158 participants with mortality/morbidity results included in the analysis. The two drug classes had similar effectiveness in lowering systolic (weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.59, 95% CI: -0.21 to 1.38) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 0.62, 95% CI: -0.06 to 1.30), all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR)): 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14), fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37) and stroke (RR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.46). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more helpful in the prevention and/or the hospitalization for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were similarly effective in decreasing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more protective in the advancement and/or hospitalization of the hypertensive patient for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers.

摘要

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是常用于治疗高血压的药物。然而,关于它们的疗效比较的研究尚未广泛开展。本系统评价和网络荟萃分析研究了这两种降压治疗类别在降低原发性高血压患者的血压、死亡率和发病率方面的疗效比较。对 Medline 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库进行了文献检索,纳入了报告血压效应、死亡率和/或发病率的安慰剂对照和阳性对照、双盲随机临床试验。30 项研究中有血压结果,涉及 7370 名参与者,8 项研究中有死亡率/发病率结果,涉及 25158 名参与者,纳入分析。这两类药物在降低收缩压(加权均数差(WMD):0.59,95%CI:-0.21 至 1.38)和舒张压(WMD:0.62,95%CI:-0.06 至 1.30)方面具有相似的效果,全因死亡率(风险比(RR)):0.96,95%CI 0.80 至 1.14)、心血管死亡率(RR:0.87,95%CI 0.67 至 1.14)、致死性和非致死性心肌梗死(RR:1.02,95%CI 0.75 至 1.37)和卒中等终点方面的疗效相似(RR:1.13,95%CI 0.87 至 1.46)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在预防和/或心力衰竭住院方面比血管紧张素受体阻滞剂更有效(RR:0.71,95%CI 0.54 至 0.93)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在降低原发性高血压患者的血压、死亡率和发病率方面同样有效。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在高血压患者心力衰竭的进展和/或住院治疗方面比血管紧张素受体阻滞剂更具保护作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验