• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在高血压中比较疗效的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.

机构信息

3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension-24h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Center, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Mar;33(3):188-201. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0138-y. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1038/s41371-018-0138-y
PMID:30518809
Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are drugs commonly used for the treatment of hypertension. However, studies on their comparative efficacy have not been extensively investigated. The current systematic review and network meta-analysis studied the comparative efficacy of the two antihypertensive treatment categories in reducing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension patients. A literature search was carried out in Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trials, which had reported blood pressure effects, mortality, and/or morbidity. Blood pressure results were found in 30 studies with 7370 participants and 8 studies with 25,158 participants with mortality/morbidity results included in the analysis. The two drug classes had similar effectiveness in lowering systolic (weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.59, 95% CI: -0.21 to 1.38) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 0.62, 95% CI: -0.06 to 1.30), all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR)): 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14), fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37) and stroke (RR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.46). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more helpful in the prevention and/or the hospitalization for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were similarly effective in decreasing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more protective in the advancement and/or hospitalization of the hypertensive patient for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers.

摘要

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是常用于治疗高血压的药物。然而,关于它们的疗效比较的研究尚未广泛开展。本系统评价和网络荟萃分析研究了这两种降压治疗类别在降低原发性高血压患者的血压、死亡率和发病率方面的疗效比较。对 Medline 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库进行了文献检索,纳入了报告血压效应、死亡率和/或发病率的安慰剂对照和阳性对照、双盲随机临床试验。30 项研究中有血压结果,涉及 7370 名参与者,8 项研究中有死亡率/发病率结果,涉及 25158 名参与者,纳入分析。这两类药物在降低收缩压(加权均数差(WMD):0.59,95%CI:-0.21 至 1.38)和舒张压(WMD:0.62,95%CI:-0.06 至 1.30)方面具有相似的效果,全因死亡率(风险比(RR)):0.96,95%CI 0.80 至 1.14)、心血管死亡率(RR:0.87,95%CI 0.67 至 1.14)、致死性和非致死性心肌梗死(RR:1.02,95%CI 0.75 至 1.37)和卒中等终点方面的疗效相似(RR:1.13,95%CI 0.87 至 1.46)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在预防和/或心力衰竭住院方面比血管紧张素受体阻滞剂更有效(RR:0.71,95%CI 0.54 至 0.93)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在降低原发性高血压患者的血压、死亡率和发病率方面同样有效。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在高血压患者心力衰竭的进展和/或住院治疗方面比血管紧张素受体阻滞剂更具保护作用。

相似文献

1
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.一项关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在高血压中比较疗效的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Mar;33(3):188-201. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0138-y. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
2
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
3
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 22;2014(8):CD009096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009096.pub2.
4
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.肾素抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD012570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012570.pub2.
5
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 1;2014(2):CD008117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008117.pub2.
6
First-line drugs for hypertension.高血压一线用药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.
7
Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.用于射血分数保留的慢性心力衰竭的β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD012721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012721.pub2.
8
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
9
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 20;1(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub5.
10
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同类别降压药物预防卒中的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0313309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309. eCollection 2025.
2
Novel Insights in the Hypertension Treatment & Type 2 Diabetics Induced by Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: MD Simulation Studies & Molecular Docking of Some Promising Natural Therapies.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对高血压治疗及2型糖尿病的新见解:分子动力学模拟研究与一些有前景的天然疗法的分子对接
ACS Omega. 2024 May 2;9(19):21234-21244. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01319. eCollection 2024 May 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Angiotensin II Antagonists in Essential Hypertension: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.血管紧张素II拮抗剂治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jun;27(6):666-682. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.721. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
ACE-inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for prevention of events in cardiovascular patients without heart failure - A network meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂用于预防无心力衰竭心血管患者的事件——一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;217:128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.132. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
3
The Number of Pills, Rather Than the Type of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitor, Predicts Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control in Essential Hypertensives on Triple Therapy: A Real-Life Cross-Sectional Study.
在三联治疗的原发性高血压患者中,控制血压的是药丸数量,而不是肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的类型:一项真实世界的横断面研究。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jul;38(7):4013-4025. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01799-3. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Individual interventions to improve adherence to pharmaceutical treatment, diet and physical activity among adults with primary hypertension. A systematic review protocol.改善原发性高血压成人患者药物治疗、饮食和体育锻炼依从性的个体干预措施。一项系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e037920. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037920.
5
In vitro and in vivo identification of clinically approved drugs that modify ACE2 expression.在体和体内鉴定能改变 ACE2 表达的临床批准药物。
Mol Syst Biol. 2020 Jul;16(7):e9628. doi: 10.15252/msb.20209628.
6
Protective Role of Enalapril in Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review.依那普利在蒽环类药物所致心脏毒性中的保护作用:一项系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 27;11:788. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00788. eCollection 2020.
7
Continuing versus suspending angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: Impact on adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)--The BRACE CORONA Trial.继续或暂停血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂:对住院严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)患者不良结局的影响——BRACE CORONA 试验。
Am Heart J. 2020 Aug;226:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan and Olmesartan on Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Korean Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Three-Parallel Group, Forced Titration, Multicenter, Phase IV Study (Fimasartan Achieving Systolic Blood Pressure Target (FAST) Study).富马酸比索沙坦对比缬沙坦和奥美沙坦治疗韩国轻中度原发性高血压患者诊室血压和动态血压的随机、双盲、阳性对照、三平行组、滴定、多中心、四期研究(富马酸比索沙坦达到收缩压目标(FAST)研究)。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Jan 23;14:347-360. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S231293. eCollection 2020.
Zofenopril or irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension untreated or uncontrolled by previous treatment: a double-blind, randomized study.
佐芬普利或厄贝沙坦加氢氯噻嗪用于既往治疗未处理或未控制的老年单纯收缩期高血压患者:一项双盲、随机研究。
J Hypertens. 2016 Mar;34(3):576-87; discussion 587. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000805.
4
Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods.在频率主义网络荟萃分析中对治疗方法进行排序无需重采样方法即可实现。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jul 31;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8.
5
Effects of blood pressure-lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 5. Head-to-head comparisons of various classes of antihypertensive drugs - overview and meta-analyses.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:5. 各类降压药物的直接比较——综述与荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2015 Jul;33(7):1321-41. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000614.
6
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价:清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.
7
A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis.用于对网络荟萃分析中治疗效果估计质量进行评级的GRADE工作组方法。
BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5630.
8
Impact of telmisartan on cardiovascular outcome in hypertensive patients at high risk: a Telmisartan Randomised AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease subanalysis.替米沙坦对高危高血压患者心血管结局的影响:一项针对不耐受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的心血管疾病受试者的替米沙坦随机评估研究的亚组分析
J Hypertens. 2014 Jun;32(6):1334-41. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000154.
9
Zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in previously treated and uncontrolled diabetic and non-diabetic essential hypertensive patients.佐芬普利联合氢氯噻嗪与厄贝沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗既往治疗和未控制的糖尿病及非糖尿病原发性高血压患者。
Adv Ther. 2014 Feb;31(2):217-33. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0090-8. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
10
Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体拮抗剂和直接肾素抑制剂治疗原发性高血压患者的比较效果的更新报告:更多的数据,几乎没有新信息。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):716-29. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1938-8. Epub 2011 Dec 7.