Mohiuddin Syed M, Mooss Aryan N, Hunter Claire B, Grollmes Timothy L, Cloutier David A, Hilleman Daniel E
Creighton University Cardiac Center, 3006 Webster St, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):446-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1587.
To compare an intensive smoking cessation intervention against usual care in hospitalized high-risk smokers with acute cardiovascular disease.
A total of 209 hospitalized smokers were randomized to the intensive intervention (n = 109) or to usual care (n = 100). Usual care consisted only of counseling and printed educational material provided prior to hospital discharge. Intensive treatment consisted of a minimum of 12 weeks of behavior modification counseling and individualized pharmacotherapy provided at no cost to the participant. Smoking status in all subjects was confirmed biochemically (ie, by measuring expired carbon monoxide) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization. Outcomes included point prevalence and continuous abstinence smoking cessation rates, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality.
At each follow-up interval, point prevalence and continuous abstinence smoking cessation rates were significantly greater in the intensive-treatment group compared to the usual-care group. At 24 months, continuous abstinence smoking cessation rates were 33% in the intensive-treatment group and 9% in the usual-care group (p < 0.0001). Over the 2-year follow-up period, 41 patients in the usual-care group were hospitalized compared to 25 patients in the intensive-treatment group (relative risk reduction [RRR], 44%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16 to 63%; p = 0.007). The all-cause mortality rate was 2.8% in the intensive-treatment group and 12.0% in the usual-care group (RRR, 77%; 95% CI, 27 to 93%; p = 0.014). The absolute risk reduction in mortality was 9.2% with a number needed to treat of 11.
Hospitalized smokers, especially those with cardiovascular disease, should undergo treatment with a structured intensive cessation intervention. The duration of the initial treatment should be 3 months.
比较强化戒烟干预措施与常规护理对患有急性心血管疾病的住院高危吸烟者的效果。
总共209名住院吸烟者被随机分为强化干预组(n = 109)或常规护理组(n = 100)。常规护理仅包括出院前提供的咨询和印刷的教育材料。强化治疗包括至少12周的行为矫正咨询和为参与者免费提供的个体化药物治疗。在随机分组后的3、6、12和24个月,通过生化方法(即测量呼出一氧化碳)确认所有受试者的吸烟状态。结果包括时点患病率、持续戒烟率、住院率和全因死亡率。
在每个随访间隔期,强化治疗组的时点患病率和持续戒烟率均显著高于常规护理组。在24个月时,强化治疗组的持续戒烟率为33%,常规护理组为9%(p < 0.0001)。在2年的随访期内,常规护理组有41名患者住院,而强化治疗组有25名患者住院(相对风险降低[RRR],44%;95%置信区间[CI],16%至63%;p = 0.007)。强化治疗组的全因死亡率为2.8%,常规护理组为12.0%(RRR,77%;95%CI,27%至93%;p = 0.014)。死亡率的绝对风险降低为9.2%,需治疗人数为11。
住院吸烟者,尤其是患有心血管疾病的吸烟者,应接受结构化强化戒烟干预治疗。初始治疗时间应为3个月。