Suppr超能文献

根据抗凝控制情况对随机接受华法林治疗的患者的结局进行比较:SPORTIF III和V研究的结果。

Comparison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin therapy according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V.

作者信息

White Harvey D, Gruber Michael, Feyzi Jan, Kaatz Scott, Tse Hung-Fat, Husted Steen, Albers Gregory W

机构信息

Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1030, New Zealand.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):239-45. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.239.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Warfarin sodium reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, but international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring is required. Target INRs are frequently not achieved, and the risk of death, bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) may be related to INR control.

METHODS

We analyzed the relationship between INR control and the rates of death, bleeding, MI, and stroke or SEE among 3587 patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to receive warfarin treatment in the SPORTIF (Stroke Prevention Using an Oral Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation) III and V trials. The mean+/-SD follow-up was 16.6 +/- 6.3 months. Patients were divided into 3 equal groups (those with good control [>75%], those with moderate control [60%-75%], or those with poor control [<60%]) according to the percentage time with an INR of 2.0 to 3.0. Outcomes were compared according to INR control. The main outcome measures were death, bleeding, MI, and stroke or SEE.

RESULTS

The poor control group had higher rates of annual mortality (4.20%) and major bleeding (3.85%) compared with the moderate control group (1.84% and 1.96%, respectively) and the good control group (1.69% and 1.58%, respectively) (P<.01 for all). Compared with the good control group, the poor control group had higher rates of MI (1.38% vs 0.62%, P = .04) and of stroke or SEE (2.10% vs 1.07%, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin, the risks of death, MI, major bleeding, and stroke or SEE are related to INR control. Good INR control is important to improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

华法林钠可降低心房颤动患者的中风风险,但需要监测国际标准化比值(INR)。目标INR常常无法达到,死亡、出血、心肌梗死(MI)以及中风或全身性栓塞事件(SEE)的风险可能与INR控制情况有关。

方法

我们在SPORTIF(心房颤动口服凝血酶抑制剂预防中风)III和V试验中,分析了3587例随机接受华法林治疗的心房颤动患者的INR控制情况与死亡、出血、MI以及中风或SEE发生率之间的关系。平均随访时间为16.6±6.3个月。根据INR在2.0至3.0之间的时间百分比,将患者分为3组(控制良好组[>75%]、控制中等组[60%-75%]或控制不佳组[<60%])。根据INR控制情况比较结果。主要结局指标为死亡、出血、MI以及中风或SEE。

结果

与控制中等组(分别为1.8%和1.96%)和控制良好组(分别为1.69%和1.58%)相比,控制不佳组的年死亡率(4.20%)和大出血发生率(3.85%)更高(所有P值均<0.01)。与控制良好组相比,控制不佳组的MI发生率(1.38%对0.62%,P = 0.04)和中风或SEE发生率(2.10%对1.07%,P = 0.02)更高。

结论

在服用华法林的心房颤动患者中,死亡、MI、大出血以及中风或SEE的风险与INR控制情况有关。良好的INR控制对于改善患者预后很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验