Salerno Stephen M, Hurst Frank P, Halvorson Stephanie, Mercado Donna L
Department of Internal Medicine, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Road, Honolulu, HI 96859, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):271-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.271.
Little information in the literature exists to guide consult interactions between different medical specialties.
A total of 323 general internists, family medicine physicians, general surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) from 3 academic medical centers completed a survey addressing their ideal relationship with consultants. Differences between surgeons and nonsurgeons were calculated using logistic regression, adjusting for location and trainee status. Differences between different specialties of surgeons were calculated using analysis of variance with Scheffe post hoc analysis
There was a 72% response rate. About half of respondents were surgeons and the rest were general internists and family medicine physicians. More nonsurgeons (69%) desired the consultant to focus on a narrow question than did surgeons (41%). Over half (59%) of family medicine physicians and internists preferred to retain order-writing authority on their patients compared with 37% of surgeons (P<.001). Of the surgeons preferring to retain authority, 70% believed it was appropriate for consultants to write orders after a verbal discussion. Orthopedic surgeons desired consultants to write orders and co-manage patients significantly more compared with general surgeons and OB/GYNs (P<.001). Only 29% of physicians thought literature references were useful in consultations. Most physicians (75%) desired direct verbal communication with the specialist providing the consultation. Most family physicians (78%) believed there was little need for general internal medicine input, preferring to consult medicine subspecialists directly.
Specialty-dependent differences exist in consult preferences of physicians. These differences vary from the extremes of orthopedic surgeons desiring a comprehensive co-management approach with the consultant to general internists and family medicine physicians desiring to retain control over order writing and have a more focused consultant approach.
文献中几乎没有信息可指导不同医学专科之间的会诊互动。
来自3个学术医疗中心的323名普通内科医生、家庭医学医生、普通外科医生、骨科医生以及妇产科医生完成了一项关于他们与会诊医生理想关系的调查。使用逻辑回归计算外科医生和非外科医生之间的差异,并对地点和受训者状态进行调整。使用方差分析和谢费事后分析计算不同外科专科之间的差异。
回复率为72%。约一半的受访者是外科医生,其余是普通内科医生和家庭医学医生。与外科医生(41%)相比,更多的非外科医生(69%)希望会诊医生专注于一个狭义的问题。超过一半(59%)的家庭医学医生和内科医生更愿意保留对其患者的医嘱开具权,而外科医生的这一比例为37%(P<0.001)。在希望保留医嘱开具权的外科医生中,70%认为会诊医生在进行口头讨论后开具医嘱是合适的。与普通外科医生和妇产科医生相比,骨科医生更希望会诊医生开具医嘱并共同管理患者(P<0.001)。只有29%的医生认为文献参考文献在会诊中有用。大多数医生(75%)希望与提供会诊的专科医生进行直接的口头沟通。大多数家庭医生(78%)认为几乎不需要普通内科的参与,更愿意直接咨询内科亚专科医生。
医生在会诊偏好方面存在专科依赖性差异。这些差异从骨科医生希望与会诊医生采用全面共同管理方法的极端情况,到普通内科医生和家庭医学医生希望保留对医嘱开具的控制权并采用更具针对性的会诊医生方法各不相同。