• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们是在提供咨询、共同护理还是接管?一个概念框架。

Are We Consulting, Sharing Care, or Taking Over? A Conceptual Framework.

作者信息

Pereira José, Klinger Christopher, Seow Hsien, Marshall Denise, Herx Leonie

机构信息

Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

出版信息

Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Feb 23;5(1):104-115. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0079. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0079
PMID:38415077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary- and specialist-level palliative care services are needed. They should work collaboratively and synergistically. Although several service models have been described, these remain open to different interpretations and deployment.

AIM

This article describes a conceptual framework, the Consultation-Shared Care-Takeover (C-S-T) Framework, its evolution and its applications.

DESIGN

An iterative process informed the development of the Framework. This included a symposium, literature searches, results from three studies, and real-life applications.

RESULTS

The C-S-T Framework represents a spectrum anchored by the model at one end, the model at the other end, and the model in the center. Indicators, divided into five domains, help differentiate one model from the other. The domains are (1) Scope (What aspects of care are addressed by the palliative care clinician?); (2) Prescriber (Who prescribes the treatments?); (3) Communication (What communication occurs between the palliative care clinician and the patient's attending clinician?); (4) Follow-up (Who provides the follow-up visits and what is their frequency?); and (5) Most responsible practitioner (MRP) (Who is identified as MRP?). Each model demonstrates strengths, limitations, uses, and roles.

CONCLUSIONS

The C-S-T Framework can be used to better describe, understand, assess, and monitor models being used by specialist palliative care teams in their interactions with primary care providers and other specialist services. Large studies are needed to test the application of the Framework on a broader scale in health care systems.

摘要

背景

需要初级和专科层面的姑息治疗服务。它们应协同合作、形成合力。尽管已经描述了几种服务模式,但这些模式仍存在不同的解读和应用方式。

目的

本文描述了一个概念框架,即咨询-共享护理-接管(C-S-T)框架、其演变过程及其应用。

设计

一个迭代过程为该框架的开发提供了依据。这包括一次研讨会、文献检索、三项研究的结果以及实际应用。

结果

C-S-T框架代表了一个范围,一端以 模式为锚定,另一端以 模式为锚定,中间为 模式。分为五个领域的指标有助于区分不同模式。这些领域包括:(1)范围(姑息治疗临床医生处理护理的哪些方面?);(2)开处方者(谁开治疗处方?);(3)沟通(姑息治疗临床医生与患者的主治临床医生之间发生何种沟通?);(4)随访(谁提供随访以及随访频率是多少?);以及(5)最主要负责医生(MRP)(谁被确定为MRP?)。每种模式都展示了其优势、局限性、用途和作用。

结论

C-S-T框架可用于更好地描述、理解、评估和监测专科姑息治疗团队在与初级保健提供者及其他专科服务互动时所使用的模式。需要进行大规模研究以在医疗保健系统中更广泛地测试该框架的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/c5eb1d3af325/pmr.2023.0079_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/7042e97df7af/pmr.2023.0079_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/d080df7533da/pmr.2023.0079_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/c5eb1d3af325/pmr.2023.0079_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/7042e97df7af/pmr.2023.0079_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/d080df7533da/pmr.2023.0079_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5402/10898231/c5eb1d3af325/pmr.2023.0079_figure3.jpg

相似文献

1
Are We Consulting, Sharing Care, or Taking Over? A Conceptual Framework.我们是在提供咨询、共同护理还是接管?一个概念框架。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Feb 23;5(1):104-115. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0079. eCollection 2024.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Palliative care physicians' motivations for models of practicing in the community: A qualitative descriptive study.姑息治疗医师选择在社区执业模式的动机:一项定性描述性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):181-188. doi: 10.1177/02692163211055022. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
5
What are the views of hospital-based generalist palliative care professionals on what facilitates or hinders collaboration with in-patient specialist palliative care teams? A systematically constructed narrative synthesis.以医院为基础的普通姑息治疗专业人员对于促进或阻碍与住院专科姑息治疗团队协作的因素有何看法?一项系统构建的叙述性综述。
Palliat Med. 2016 Mar;30(3):240-56. doi: 10.1177/0269216315615483. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
7
8
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
9
A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.一个用于姑息治疗研究的更公平、多元和包容的患者及公众参与框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00525-3.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Intensive Care Unit Consultation.姑息治疗临床医生在重症监护病房会诊时应了解的十大技巧。
J Palliat Med. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1177/10966218251366072.
2
Evaluating interprofessional primary care teams in high-income countries: A scoping review protocol on the conceptualization and measurement of team functioning, effectiveness, performance and collaboration in primary care.评估高收入国家的跨专业初级保健团队:关于初级保健中团队功能、有效性、绩效和协作的概念化与测量的范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328708. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Public Health and Palliative Care.公共卫生与姑息治疗。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;39(3):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Biopsy of Canada's family physician shortage.加拿大家庭医生短缺的活组织检查。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002236.
3
Family Physicians with Certificates of Added Competence in Palliative Care Contribute to Comprehensive Care in Their Communities: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.拥有姑息治疗附加能力证书的家庭医生为其社区的综合护理做出贡献:一项定性描述性研究。
Older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease and access to palliative care: Retrospective cohort study in primary care.
患有晚期慢性肾病且可获得姑息治疗的老年人:初级保健中的回顾性队列研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Feb;71(2):122-127. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7102122.
4
Palliative Care Consultation and Takeover Models: Cut Your Coat According to Your Cloth.姑息治疗咨询与接管模式:量体裁衣。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 May 15;5(1):185-186. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0025. eCollection 2024.
Palliat Med Rep. 2023 Feb 16;4(1):28-35. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2022.0057. eCollection 2023.
4
Collaborative mental health care: Engaging health systems to support a team-based approach.协作式精神卫生保健:促使卫生系统支持基于团队的方法。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 Feb;69(2):81-83. doi: 10.46747/cfp.690281.
5
Development of a national quality framework for palliative care in a mixed generalist and specialist care model: A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique.制定混合普通科和专科护理模式下的全国姑息治疗质量框架:全部门办法和改良德尔菲技术。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265726. eCollection 2022.
6
Generalist versus Specialist Palliative Medicine.通才与专科姑息医学。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Feb;25(2):193-199. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0644. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Palliative care physicians' motivations for models of practicing in the community: A qualitative descriptive study.姑息治疗医师选择在社区执业模式的动机:一项定性描述性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):181-188. doi: 10.1177/02692163211055022. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
8
Primary-level palliative care national capacity: Pallium Canada.基层姑息治疗国家能力:加拿大姑息治疗协会
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 27. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003036.
9
Workforce Planning for Community-Based Palliative Care Specialist Teams Using Operations Research.运用运筹学方法规划社区姑息治疗专科团队的劳动力
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 May;61(5):1012-1022.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations - perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians.住院患者姑息治疗咨询的影响、挑战和局限性 - 请求和进行医师的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4936-x.