Suppr超能文献

泌尿科住院患者中医疗医院医师主动手术协作管理的效果:一项回顾性队列研究。

Effect of Active Surgical Co-Management by Medical Hospitalists in Urology Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Hospital Medicine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2023 Sep;64(9):558-565. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0143.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpatient care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satisfaction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards.

RESULTS

We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) required co-management for a significantly shorter duration (=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores.

CONCLUSION

Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估内科医院医师在泌尿外科住院患者治疗中的积极手术共管(SCM)的使用情况。

材料和方法

自 2019 年 3 月以来,一家三级保健医疗中心实施了医院医师-SCM 项目,并对共管泌尿外科住院患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们评估了接受 SCM 的泌尿外科住院患者的临床结果,并将被动 SCM(仅在请求时由医院医师共同管理患者;2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 6 月)与主动 SCM(根据医院医师的主动筛查共同管理患者;2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 10 月)进行了比较。我们还评估了接受 SCM 的患者对住院治疗质量、安全性以及对出院或转至其他病房时住院治疗的主观满意度的看法。

结果

我们评估了 525 名患者。与被动 SCM 组(n=205)相比,主动 SCM 组(n=320)的患者需要共同管理的时间明显缩短(=0.012),泌尿外科病房的住院时间也较短(=0.062),出院后 30 天内计划性再入院的频率较低(=0.095),而快速反应小组的激活事件明显较少(=0.002)。患者转至重症监护病房的比例、住院死亡率或住院护理问卷评分均无差异。

结论

内科医院医师对泌尿外科住院患者进行主动监测和共同管理可以提高住院护理的质量和效果,而不会影响主观住院满意度。

相似文献

2
Surgical Comanagement by Hospitalists in Colorectal Surgery.
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):404-410.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Hospitalists on an inpatient tertiary care oncology teaching service.
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):e114-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.000661. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
6
Improved Inpatient Care through Greater Patient-Doctor Contact under the Hospitalist Management Approach: A Real-Time Assessment.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115718.
7
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction in Inpatient Care Provided by Hospitalists and Nonhospitalists in South Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158101.
9
Oncology hospitalist impact on hospice utilization.
Cancer. 2023 Dec 1;129(23):3797-3804. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35008. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of the hospitalist care model in an acute medical unit: a benefit-cost analysis.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 29;14(7):e081594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081594.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of a geriatric comanagement (GERICO) pilot program for patients 75 and older undergoing radical cystectomy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;48(6):1427-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
2
A surgical hospitalist system in Korea: a preliminary study of the effects on hospital costs and postoperative outcomes.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 May;100(5):298-304. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.5.298. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
3
Development and Evolution of Hospital Medicine in Korea.
J Hosp Med. 2021 Apr;16(4):247-250. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3573.
6
Surgical Comanagement by Hospitalists Improves Patient Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):275-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001629.
7
Effect of comanagement with internal medicine on hospital stay of patients admitted to the Service of Otolaryngology.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2015 Sep-Oct;66(5):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jul;149(7):633-40. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.241.
9
Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e83795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083795. eCollection 2014.
10
Should every adult patient in the hospital have an internist?
Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(4):283-4. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.1314719.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验