Suppr超能文献

保存液对人胰岛分离结果的影响。

Influence of preservation solution on human islet isolation outcome.

作者信息

Hubert Thomas, Gmyr Valéry, Arnalsteen Laurent, Jany Thomas, Triponez Frédéric, Caiazzo Robert, Vandewalle Brigitte, Vantyghem Marie-Christine, Kerr-Conte Julie, Pattou Francois

机构信息

Inserm U859, Diabetes Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Lille 2 University, Lille, France.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2007 Feb 15;83(3):270-6. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000251723.97483.16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The influence of the preservation solution used for in situ perfusion of the donor and pancreas storage on islet isolation has received little attention.

METHODS

In this prospective controlled trial, we compared the outcome of human islet isolation from pancreata perfused with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or Celsior, an alternative colloid-free extracellular solution.

RESULTS

At the 1-year interim analysis, the viability and insulin secretion of islets isolated from donors perfused with UW (n=19) or Celsior (n=5) were identical. However, total islet recovery (IEQ) and isolation yield (IEQ/g) were 1.8-fold and 2.1-fold inferior in the Celsior group (P<0.05 vs. UW). Overall, 13 (68%) of islet preparations were effectively transplanted from the UW group vs. none from the Celsior group (P=0.01). The clinical study was discontinued and the causes of these differences were further explored in the pig (n=14). In contrast to UW, Celsior induced cell swelling and pancreas edema after only four hours of cold storage. These abnormalities were delayed when the donor was perfused with Solution de Conservation d'Organes et de Tissus (SCOT), an extracellular solution containing polyethylene glycol.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that colloid-free preservation solutions might be suboptimal for pancreas perfusion and cold storage prior to islet isolation and transplantation. Because pancreata are now frequently recovered for islet transplantation, preliminary experimental and clinical data about islet isolation should be obtained prior to the routine implementation of new preservation solutions for abdominal perfusion during multiorgan recovery.

摘要

背景

用于供体原位灌注和胰腺保存的保存液对胰岛分离的影响鲜受关注。

方法

在这项前瞻性对照试验中,我们比较了用威斯康星大学(UW)溶液或Celsior(一种不含胶体的细胞外替代溶液)灌注的胰腺进行人胰岛分离的结果。

结果

在1年中期分析时,从用UW溶液灌注的供体(n = 19)或Celsior溶液灌注的供体(n = 5)中分离出的胰岛的活力和胰岛素分泌情况相同。然而,Celsior组的总胰岛回收率(胰岛当量)和分离产率(胰岛当量/克)分别低1.8倍和2.1倍(与UW组相比,P<0.05)。总体而言,UW组有13例(68%)胰岛制剂成功进行了有效移植,而Celsior组无一例(P = 0.01)。该临床研究停止,并在猪(n = 14)中进一步探究这些差异的原因。与UW溶液不同,Celsior溶液在冷藏仅4小时后就会引起细胞肿胀和胰腺水肿。当供体用含有聚乙二醇的细胞外溶液——器官和组织保存溶液(SCOT)灌注时,这些异常情况出现的时间会延迟。

结论

我们的结果表明,不含胶体的保存液对于胰岛分离和移植前的胰腺灌注及冷藏可能并非最佳选择。由于现在经常获取胰腺用于胰岛移植,在多器官获取期间常规应用新的腹部灌注保存液之前,应获取有关胰岛分离的初步实验和临床数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验