Bottieau E, Clerinx J, Colebunders R, Van den Enden E, Wouters R, Demey H, Van Esbroeck M, Vervoort T, Van Gompel A, Van den Ende J
Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;26(3):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0264-x.
The ambulatory management of imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria is controversial because criteria for safe selection of patients are imprecise. The aim of the present study was to investigate the evolution and outcome of patients diagnosed with Plasmodium falciparum malaria at a Belgian referral institute in order to assess the safety of the institute's current selective ambulatory management protocol. From 2000 to 2005, all patients diagnosed with P. falciparum infection at the Institute of Tropical Medicine and the University Hospital of Antwerp were enrolled prospectively. Ambulatory treatment was offered to nonvomiting patients if they exhibited none of the 2000 World Health Organization criteria of severity and had parasitemia below 1% at the initial assessment. The treatment of choice was quinine (plus doxycycline or clindamycin) for inpatients and atovaquone-proguanil for outpatients. P. falciparum malaria was diagnosed in 387 patients, of whom 246 (64%) were Western travelers or expatriates and 117 (30%) were already on antimalarial therapy. At diagnosis, 60 (15%) patients had severe malaria. Vital organ dysfunction was initially seen in 34 and developed later in five others. Five patients died. Of the 327 patients initially assessed as having uncomplicated malaria, 113 (35%) were admitted immediately; of these, 4 developed parasitemia >/=5% at a later stage but without any clinical consequence. None of the 214 individuals initially treated as outpatients experienced any malaria-related complications, including 10 who were admitted later. Vital organ dysfunction was observed in only 2 of the 214 patients with initial parasitemia <1% who had not taken antimalarial agents (both patients had impaired consciousness at presentation). Ambulatory treatment is safe in treatment-naive malaria patients with parasitemia <1% who do not vomit and who do not exhibit any criteria of severe malaria.
输入疟原虫疟疾的非住院治疗存在争议,因为安全选择患者的标准并不精确。本研究的目的是调查在比利时一家转诊机构被诊断为输入性疟原虫疟疾患者的病情演变和转归,以评估该机构当前选择性非住院治疗方案的安全性。2000年至2005年,前瞻性纳入了热带医学研究所和安特卫普大学医院所有被诊断为疟原虫感染的患者。对于不呕吐的患者,如果他们不符合2000年世界卫生组织的任何严重程度标准且在初始评估时寄生虫血症低于1%,则给予非住院治疗。住院患者的首选治疗药物是奎宁(加强力霉素或克林霉素),门诊患者的首选治疗药物是阿托伐醌-氯胍。387例患者被诊断为疟原虫疟疾,其中246例(64%)为西方旅行者或侨民,117例(30%)已在接受抗疟治疗。诊断时,60例(15%)患者患有重症疟疾。34例患者最初出现重要器官功能障碍,另有5例随后出现。5例患者死亡。在最初被评估为非重症疟疾的327例患者中,113例(35%)立即入院;其中4例在后期出现寄生虫血症≥5%,但无任何临床后果。最初作为门诊患者治疗的214例患者中,无一例出现任何与疟疾相关的并发症,包括10例后来入院的患者。在最初寄生虫血症<1%且未服用抗疟药物的214例患者中,仅2例出现重要器官功能障碍(这2例患者就诊时均有意识障碍)。对于未接受过治疗、寄生虫血症<1%、不呕吐且未表现出任何重症疟疾标准的疟疾患者,非住院治疗是安全的。