Jonsson Per, Karlsson Lars, Forsberg Ulf, Gref Margareta, Stegmayr Christofer, Stegmayr Bernd
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, University Hospital of Umeå, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.
Artif Organs. 2007 Feb;31(2):132-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00352.x.
During hemodialysis microembolic findings have been noted after the venous chamber (subclavian vein). The aim of this study was to evaluate if air could pass the venous chamber and, if so, if it passes the safety-system detector for air-infusion without triggering an alarm. Various in vitro dialysis settings were performed using regular dialysis devices. A dextran fluid was used instead of blood to avoid the risk of development of emboli. Optical visualization as well as recirculation and collection of eventual air into an intermediate bag were investigated. In addition, a specifically designed ultrasound monitor was placed after the venous air trap to measure the presence of eventual microbubbles. Speed of dialysis fluid was changed, as was the level of the fluid in the air trap. Thereby a fluid level was considered "high" if it was close to the top of the air trap and "low" if it was around the mid part of the air trap. By optical vision microbubbles were seen at the bottom of the air trap and could pass the air trap towards the venous line without alarming. During recirculation several mL of air were collected in an intermediate bag after the venous line. Ultrasound monitoring exhibited the presence of microbubbles of the size of approximately 5 microm upwards passing to the venous line in all runs performed. Amount of bubbles differed between devices and in general an increased fluid speed correlated significantly with the increased counts of microbubbles/min. No alarming of the detector occurred. A more concentrated fluid allowed higher counts/min when flow was increased to 600 mL/min. Data revealed that air passes the safety-sensor in the air trap without alarming. The presence of air increased in general with fluid speed and a lower fluid level in the air trap. Differences were present between devices. If this affects the patients has to be elucidated.
在血液透析过程中,已注意到静脉腔(锁骨下静脉)后出现微栓塞现象。本研究的目的是评估空气是否能通过静脉腔,如果可以,它是否能通过空气注入安全系统探测器而不触发警报。使用常规透析设备进行了各种体外透析设置。使用葡聚糖液体代替血液以避免形成栓子的风险。研究了光学可视化以及最终空气的再循环和收集到中间袋中的情况。此外,在静脉空气捕捉器之后放置了专门设计的超声监测器,以测量最终微气泡的存在。改变了透析液的流速以及空气捕捉器中的液位。因此,如果液位接近空气捕捉器顶部,则认为液位“高”,如果液位在空气捕捉器中部附近,则认为液位“低”。通过光学观察,在空气捕捉器底部可见微气泡,并且这些微气泡可以通过空气捕捉器进入静脉管路而不触发警报。在再循环过程中,在静脉管路后的中间袋中收集了几毫升空气。超声监测显示,在所有进行的实验中,大小约为5微米及以上的微气泡都存在并进入静脉管路。不同设备之间气泡数量不同,一般来说,流速增加与微气泡计数/分钟增加显著相关。探测器未触发警报。当流速增加到600毫升/分钟时,更浓缩的液体允许更高的计数/分钟。数据显示,空气通过空气捕捉器中的安全传感器而不触发警报。一般来说,空气的存在随着流速增加以及空气捕捉器中液位降低而增加。不同设备之间存在差异。这是否会影响患者还有待阐明。