Reit C, Bergenholtz G, Caplan D, Molander A
Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Int Endod J. 2007 Apr;40(4):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2007.01210.x. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
AIM: To study the influence of two educational programmes on the adoption of nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation (NTRI) amongst general dental practitioners in a short-term as well as a long-term perspective. METHODOLOGY: All dentists employed in the Gothenburg Dental service (n = 148) were enrolled in the study. The clinics in the organization were randomly assigned to one of two educational programmes. In the first programme a 4-h lecture on root canal instrumentation was given. In the second programme the lecture course was supplemented by a 6-h hands-on training session. The short-term effect was measured by a questionnaire distributed 6 months after completed education. The long-term effect was evaluated 4 years later. RESULTS: The overall utilization rate of NTRI increased from 4% to 73%. However, lectures in combination with hands-on training resulted in a better short-term acceptance rate (94%) than if teaching was given only in lecture-format (53%) (P = 0.000). As a consequence, all staff were offered hands-on training. The long-term adoption rate was 88%. Reasons for accepting the new technology usually were found within the 'relative advantage' category. Common reasons for dentists not to adopt NTRI were that they could not get started or that they found no advantage over the old technology. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term adoption of a new technology might be influenced by the design of an introductory educational programme. For clinical procedures, such as root canal instrumentation, the inclusion of hands-on training sessions seems to be important to reach a high acceptance rate.
目的:从短期和长期角度研究两种教育方案对普通牙科医生采用镍钛旋转器械(NTRI)的影响。 方法:纳入哥德堡牙科服务机构雇佣的所有牙医(n = 148)。该机构的诊所被随机分配到两种教育方案之一。在第一个方案中,进行了一场关于根管器械操作的4小时讲座。在第二个方案中,讲座课程辅以6小时的实践培训课程。短期效果通过在完成教育6个月后发放的问卷进行测量。4年后评估长期效果。 结果:NTRI的总体使用率从4%提高到了73%。然而,与仅以讲座形式教学相比,讲座与实践培训相结合产生了更高的短期接受率(94%)(仅讲座形式为53%)(P = 0.000)。因此,为所有员工提供了实践培训。长期采用率为88%。接受新技术的原因通常在“相对优势”类别中。牙医不采用NTRI的常见原因是他们无法开始使用或认为与旧技术相比没有优势。 结论:新技术的短期采用可能受入门教育方案设计的影响。对于根管器械操作等临床程序,纳入实践培训课程似乎对达到高接受率很重要。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2013
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006-3
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022-6