Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的管理。急性处理合理但二级预防差得难以接受:欧洲糖尿病与心脏调查的一份报告

Management of coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Acute management reasonable but secondary prevention unacceptably poor: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Diabetes and the Heart.

作者信息

Anselmino Matteo, Bartnik Malgorzata, Malmberg Klas, Rydén Lars

机构信息

University Department of Cardiology, San Giovanni Battista-Molinette-Hospital, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Feb;14(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000199496.23838.83.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies applied to patients currently treated for coronary artery disease (CAD) in relation to the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM).

BACKGROUND

Despite the declining mortality related to CAD, patients with DM have not experienced similar benefits and still have a deleterious prognosis compared to their non-DM counterparts.

METHODS

The Euro Heart Survey on Diabetes and the Heart was conducted between February 2003 and January 2004 in 110 centres across 25 countries. Consecutive patients were recruited while referred to a cardiologist due to CAD, when admitted to hospital wards or visiting outpatient clinics. DM was defined as a diagnosis established before enrollment.

RESULTS

DM was reported in 1524 (31%) of 4961 patients enrolled. Among the 1872 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics at baseline, DM status did not influence the propensity to use different pharmacological agents (except renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers) or coronary interventions. In patients with stable CAD (n=2854) secondary prevention guidelines were poorly adhered to: 30% achieved blood pressure targets (<140/90 mmHg), and lipid control was adequate in a minority of DM and non-DM patients (total cholesterol >5 mmol/l: 55 versus 47%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >3 mmol/l: 57 versus 51%).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the treatment and intervention patterns of patients with ACS disappear when corrected for the clinical confounders detected. Despite the recommendations and the high cardiovascular risk, an inadequate and less aggressive management was demonstrated in the contemporary patients with diabetes and stable CAD compared with the non-diabetic counterparts.

摘要

目的

探讨针对目前正在接受冠心病(CAD)治疗的患者,根据糖尿病(DM)的存在情况所应用的诊断和治疗策略。

背景

尽管与CAD相关的死亡率有所下降,但与非DM患者相比,DM患者并未获得类似的益处,且预后仍然不良。

方法

“欧洲糖尿病与心脏调查”于2003年2月至2004年1月在25个国家的110个中心进行。连续纳入因CAD而被转诊至心脏病专家处、住院病房或门诊就诊的患者。DM定义为入组前已确立的诊断。

结果

在纳入的4961例患者中,有1524例(31%)报告患有DM。在1872例急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,校正基线临床特征差异后,DM状态不影响使用不同药物(肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统阻滞剂除外)或冠状动脉介入治疗的倾向。在稳定CAD患者(n = 2854)中,二级预防指南的遵循情况较差:30%达到血压目标(<140/90 mmHg),少数DM和非DM患者的血脂得到控制(总胆固醇>5 mmol/l:55%对47%;低密度脂蛋白胆固醇>3 mmol/l:57%对51%)。

结论

校正所检测到的临床混杂因素后,ACS患者的治疗和干预模式差异消失。尽管有相关推荐且心血管风险高,但与非糖尿病患者相比,当代糖尿病合并稳定CAD患者的管理不足且不够积极。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验