Raad I I, Sabbagh M F, Rand K H, Sherertz R J
Department of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), University of Florida, Shands Hospital, Gainesville.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jan;15(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90052-u.
The diagnostic usefulness of two quantitative catheter culture methods was compared in a prospective study of central venous arterial catheters. The roll-plate method followed by sonication was used to culture 177 catheters from 85 patients, and the sonication method was used to culture 136 catheters from 68 patients. All patients were evaluated for catheter-related infections. Catheter-related infections were associated with greater than or equal to 100 colony-forming units (CFU) isolated from catheter tips by either roll plate (p = 0.01) or sonication (p less than 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of greater than or equal to 10(3) CFU by roll plate for catheter-related septicemia were 56%, 97%, 63%, and 96% compared with 93%, 95%, 76%, and 99%, respectively, for the same level by sonication. For central venous and arterial catheters, the sonication method can distinguish infection from contamination and is superior to the roll-plate method in that it may offer a more sensitive and predictive alternative in the diagnosis of catheter-related septicemia.
在一项关于中心静脉动脉导管的前瞻性研究中,对两种定量导管培养方法的诊断效用进行了比较。采用先摇床培养后超声处理的方法,对85例患者的177根导管进行培养,同时采用超声处理方法对68例患者的136根导管进行培养。对所有患者进行导管相关感染评估。导管相关感染与通过摇床培养(p = 0.01)或超声处理(p < 0.001)从导管尖端分离出的菌落形成单位(CFU)大于或等于100相关。摇床培养CFU大于或等于10³对导管相关败血症的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为56%、97%、63%和96%,而超声处理在相同水平时分别为93%、95%、76%和99%。对于中心静脉和动脉导管,超声处理方法能够区分感染与污染,并且在诊断导管相关败血症方面比摇床培养方法更具优势,因为它可能提供一种更敏感且有预测性的替代方法。