Ilman Nevzat, Altunkan Sekip, Kayatürk Nur, Altunkan Erkan
Department of Internal Medicine, Dişkapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, Metropol Medical Center, Ankara, Turkey.
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Feb;12(1):45-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000218006.80827.dc.
Among the electronic blood pressure measuring devices used for self-measurement of blood pressure by patients, models that measure at the wrist are becoming increasingly popular. Validation studies done with these equipments, however, are quite few. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure device against the mercury sphygmomanometer in adults according to the International Protocol criteria.
Fifty-four patients over 30 years of age were studied and classified on the basis of the range of the International Protocol. Blood pressure measurements at the wrist with the Braun BP 3550 were compared with the results obtained by two trained observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer. Nine sequential blood pressure measurements were taken. A total of 33 individuals with randomly distributed arm circumferences were selected for the validation study. During the validation study, 99 measurements were obtained for comparison from 33 individuals. The first phase was performed on 15 individuals and if the device passed this phase, 18 more individuals were selected.
Mean discrepancies and standard deviations of the device sphygmomanometer were 0.4+/-8.1 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 2.1+/-5.8 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure in the study group. The device passed phase 1 in 15 individuals. In phase 2.1, from the total 99 comparisons, 65, 84 and 91 for systolic blood pressure and 62, 91 and 98 for diastolic blood pressure were <5, <10 and <15 mmHg, respectively. In phase 2.2, 23 individuals had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg, and two had no differences within 5 mmHg for systolic blood pressure. In terms of diastolic blood pressure, 23 individuals had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and three had no differences within 5 mmHg. Braun BP 3550 passed phases 2.1 and 2.2 in the adult participants.
The Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure device passed according to the International Protocol criteria and can be recommended for use in adults. Deviation from the average value, however, was greater in patients with high systolic blood pressure as compared with those with lower blood pressure.
在患者用于自测血压的电子血压测量设备中,腕部测量型设备越来越受欢迎。然而,针对这些设备的验证研究却相当少。本研究的目的是根据国际协议标准,评估博朗BP 3550腕式血压设备相对于汞柱式血压计在成年人中的准确性。
对54名30岁以上的患者进行研究,并根据国际协议范围进行分类。将使用博朗BP 3550进行的腕部血压测量结果与两名经过培训的观察者使用汞柱式血压计获得的结果进行比较。进行了9次连续的血压测量。总共选择了33名臂围随机分布的个体进行验证研究。在验证研究期间,从33名个体中获得了99次测量结果用于比较。第一阶段对15名个体进行,如果设备通过该阶段,则再选择18名个体。
在研究组中,该设备与血压计的收缩压平均差异和标准差为0.4±8.1 mmHg,舒张压为2.1±5.8 mmHg。该设备在15名个体中通过了第一阶段。在第二阶段1中,在总共99次比较中,收缩压<5 mmHg、<10 mmHg和<15 mmHg的分别有65次、84次和91次,舒张压<5 mmHg、<10 mmHg和<15 mmHg的分别有62次、91次和98次。在第二阶段2中,23名个体的收缩压至少有两次差异在5 mmHg以内,两名个体的收缩压差异在5 mmHg以内无差异。就舒张压而言,23名个体的至少两次差异在5 mmHg以内,三名个体的舒张压差异在5 mmHg以内无差异。博朗BP 3550在成年参与者中通过了第二阶段1和第二阶段2。
博朗BP 3550腕式血压设备符合国际协议标准,可以推荐用于成年人。然而,与血压较低的患者相比,收缩压较高的患者与平均值的偏差更大。