• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科不良事件检测经验:事件的发生率和结局

Experience in adverse events detection in an emergency department: incidence and outcome of events.

作者信息

Hendrie James, Sammartino Luke, Silvapulle Mervyn J, Braitberg George

机构信息

Emergency Department, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Feb;19(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00896.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00896.x
PMID:17305656
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study was performed to determine the incidence, outcome and preventability of adverse events (AE) in an ED.

METHODS

The Quality in Australian Health Care Study methodology, modified to the ED, was utilized. Case histories of patients presenting to a tertiary hospital ED were screened for events. Events detected were classified, using a 104-item data collection instrument, entered on Excel and analysed statistically using MINITAB.

RESULTS

A total of 5345 patients presented during the study period. Three thousand three hundred and thirty-two patients completed full evaluation and comprised the study population. One hundred and ninety-four events were detected. Except where specified, events with management causation < or = 3 were excluded. This excluded 24 events (12.4%) leaving 170 for analysis. Of patients suffering an event, 53.5% occurred prior ED attendance, 41.7% of AE occurred within the ED, and 4.7% had contributions from both. The overall event rate, detected by the screening process, was 5.1%, with an incident rate of 1.98% and AE rate of 3.12%. The ED AE rate was 1.0%. If only those with management causation = 1 are excluded, then the overall event rate was 5.52%, with an AE rate of 3.33%. Fifty-five per cent of events were judged to be preventable (preventability score > or = 3). Events resulting in death and disability were more likely to be preventable (P < or = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the Quality in Australian Health Care Study methodology has been utilized to provide data on incidents and AE in an ED.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定急诊科不良事件(AE)的发生率、结局及可预防性。

方法

采用针对急诊科进行修改的澳大利亚医疗保健质量研究方法。对一家三级医院急诊科就诊患者的病历进行事件筛查。使用104项数据收集工具对检测到的事件进行分类,录入Excel并使用MINITAB进行统计分析。

结果

研究期间共有5345名患者就诊。3332名患者完成了全面评估并构成研究人群。共检测到194起事件。除另有规定外,管理因果关系≤3的事件被排除。这排除了24起事件(12.4%),剩余170起进行分析。在发生事件的患者中,53.5%的事件发生在急诊科就诊之前,41.7%的不良事件发生在急诊科内,4.7%的事件二者均有促成因素。通过筛查过程检测到的总体事件发生率为5.1%,发生率为1.98%,不良事件发生率为3.1%。急诊科不良事件发生率为1.0%。若仅排除管理因果关系=1的事件,则总体事件发生率为5.52%,不良事件发生率为3.33%。55%的事件被判定为可预防(可预防性评分≥3)。导致死亡和残疾的事件更有可能是可预防的(P≤0.04)。

结论

总之,已采用澳大利亚医疗保健质量研究方法来提供急诊科事件和不良事件的数据。

相似文献

1
Experience in adverse events detection in an emergency department: incidence and outcome of events.急诊科不良事件检测经验:事件的发生率和结局
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Feb;19(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00896.x.
2
Experience in adverse events detection in an emergency department: nature of events.急诊科不良事件检测经验:事件性质
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Feb;19(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00897.x.
3
Representative case series from New Zealand public hospital admissions in 1998--III: adverse events and death.1998年新西兰公立医院住院病例系列报道——第三部分:不良事件与死亡情况
N Z Med J. 2006 Mar 31;119(1231):U1909.
4
A pilot study examining undesirable events among emergency department-boarded patients awaiting inpatient beds.一项针对等待住院床位的急诊科滞留患者不良事件的初步研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;54(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
5
Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals II: preventability and clinical context.新西兰公立医院的不良事件II:可预防性及临床背景
N Z Med J. 2003 Oct 10;116(1183):U624.
6
Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study.荷兰医院中的不良事件及潜在可预防死亡:一项回顾性患者病历审查研究的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025924.
7
Safety climate and medical errors in 62 US emergency departments.62 家美国急诊科的安全氛围与医疗差错。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;60(5):555-563.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.018.
8
The safety of hospital stroke care.医院中风护理的安全性。
Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):550-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000254992.39919.2e.
9
Characteristics of patient care management problems identified in emergency department morbidity and mortality investigations during 15 years.15年间急诊科发病率和死亡率调查中确定的患者护理管理问题的特征
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;51(3):251-61, 261.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.483. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
10
Adverse events detected by clinical surveillance on an obstetric service.通过产科服务临床监测发现的不良事件。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1073-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242565.28432.7c.

引用本文的文献

1
How safe are paediatric emergency departments? A national prospective cohort study.儿科急诊科有多安全?一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct 19;31(11):806-817. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014608.
2
National and Institutional Trends in Adverse Events Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Retrospective Patient Record Review Studies.随着时间的推移,国家和机构不良事件趋势:系统评价和纵向回顾性患者记录回顾研究的荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):141-148. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000804.
3
Adverse events in the paediatric emergency department: a prospective cohort study.
儿科急诊中的不良事件:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Mar;30(3):216-227. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健环境中可预防的患者伤害的发生率、严重程度和性质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
5
Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions.改善急诊护理中患者安全的治理:干预措施的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837.
6
Adverse events related to emergency department care: a systematic review.与急诊科护理相关的不良事件:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 12;8(9):e74214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074214. eCollection 2013.