Einat Haim
University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, 376 Kirby Plaza, 1208 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, USA.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(6):850-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
The state of animal models for bipolar disorder (BPD) is deficient, creating a major problem in the research related to this devastating disorder and in our ability to translate molecular findings to the clinic. An ideal model, a "bipolar animal" is most likely unattainable as long as we do not fully understand the biological basis of the disorder, and no models are currently available to reflect the cycling nature of the disease. Yet, additional, better and more practical models need to be developed to support research efforts in the field. The present paper suggests two approaches for the development of new models. The first approach, recently introduced in the literature, is based on modeling different facets of the disease with an attempt to create a test battery that will cover a number of BPD-related behaviors. Whereas each separate model may not have strong validity when used alone, additional strength may come when certain models are combined. One example for modeling a facet of the disorder is brought showing that aggressive behavior in resident mice can be ameliorated by the dissimilar mood stabilizers lithium and valproate suggesting a possible use of the model as part of the battery, representing the aggressive facet of mania. The second approach is based on identifying behavioral differences between existing strains of animals and identifying strains that may have a behavioral phenotype that resembles aspects of BPD. A similar approach has been used previously to model other psychiatric disorders and can be utilized for BPD research. An example of this possible approach is shown with the Black Swiss mice strain that appears to have more manic-like behaviors compared to other strains. Both approaches will not culminate to an ideal, all encompassing model of BPD but may provide useful and relatively uncomplicated tools for research of the disorder.
双相情感障碍(BPD)动物模型的现状并不理想,这给与这种破坏性疾病相关的研究以及我们将分子研究成果转化到临床的能力带来了重大问题。只要我们尚未完全理解该疾病的生物学基础,理想的模型,即“双相情感障碍动物模型”很可能无法实现,而且目前没有任何模型能够反映该疾病的发作周期特性。然而,仍需要开发更多、更好且更实用的模型来支持该领域的研究工作。本文提出了两种开发新模型的方法。第一种方法是最近文献中介绍的,基于对疾病不同方面进行建模,试图创建一组测试,涵盖一些与双相情感障碍相关的行为。虽然每个单独的模型单独使用时可能有效性不强,但某些模型组合使用时可能会有额外的优势。文中给出了一个对疾病某一方面进行建模的例子,表明在常驻小鼠中,不同的情绪稳定剂锂盐和丙戊酸盐可以改善攻击性行为,这表明该模型可能作为测试组的一部分,代表躁狂的攻击方面。第二种方法是基于识别现有动物品系之间的行为差异,并识别可能具有类似于双相情感障碍某些方面行为表型的品系。之前也曾使用类似的方法来模拟其他精神疾病,也可用于双相情感障碍的研究。文中给出了这种可能方法的一个例子,即黑瑞士小鼠品系与其他品系相比,似乎有更多类似躁狂的行为。这两种方法都不会最终形成一个理想的、涵盖双相情感障碍所有方面的模型,但可能为该疾病的研究提供有用且相对简单的工具。