Suppr超能文献

一项关于提示清单的随机对照试验,以帮助晚期癌症患者及其护理人员询问有关预后和临终关怀的问题。

Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care.

作者信息

Clayton Josephine M, Butow Phyllis N, Tattersall Martin H N, Devine Rhonda J, Simpson Judy M, Aggarwal Ghauri, Clark Katherine J, Currow David C, Elliott Louise M, Lacey Judith, Lee Philip G, Noel Michael A

机构信息

Medical Psychology Research Unit, Department of Medicine and School of Psychology, and the School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 20;25(6):715-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7827.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether provision of a question prompt list (QPL) influences advanced cancer patients'/caregivers' questions and discussion of topics relevant to end-of-life care during consultations with a palliative care (PC) physician.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included patients randomly assigned to standard consultation or provision of QPL before consultation, with endorsement of the QPL by the physician during the consultation. Consecutive eligible patients with advanced cancer referred to 15 PC physicians from nine Australian PC services were invited to participate. Consultations were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed by blinded coders; patients completed questionnaires before, within 24 hours, and 3 weeks after the consultation.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients participated (92 QPL, 82 control). Compared with controls, QPL patients and caregivers asked twice as many questions (for patients, ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.2; P < .0001), and patients discussed 23% more issues covered by the QPL (95% CI, 11% to 37%; P < .0001). QPL patients asked more prognostic questions (ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.0; P = .004) and discussed more prognostic (ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8, P = .003) and end-of-life issues (30% v 10%; P = .001). Fewer QPL patients had unmet information needs about the future (21 = 4.14; P = .04), which was the area of greatest unmet information need. QPL consultations (average, 38 minutes) were longer (P = .002) than controls (average, 31 minutes). No differences between groups were observed in anxiety or patient/physician satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Providing a QPL and physician endorsement of its use assists terminally ill cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions and promotes discussion about prognosis and end-of-life issues, without creating patient anxiety or impairing satisfaction.

摘要

目的

确定提供问题提示清单(QPL)是否会影响晚期癌症患者/护理人员在与姑息治疗(PC)医生会诊期间提出的问题以及对与临终关怀相关主题的讨论。

患者与方法

这项随机对照试验纳入了随机分配至标准会诊组或会诊前提供QPL组的患者,会诊期间医生会认可QPL。邀请了来自澳大利亚9家PC服务机构的15位PC医生转诊的连续符合条件的晚期癌症患者参与。会诊进行录音、转录,并由盲法编码员进行分析;患者在会诊前、会诊后24小时内及3周后完成问卷调查。

结果

共有174例患者参与(QPL组92例,对照组82例)。与对照组相比,QPL组患者及护理人员提出的问题数量是对照组的两倍(患者提问比例为2.3;95%可信区间[CI]为1.7至3.2;P<.0001),患者讨论的QPL涵盖问题多23%(95%CI为11%至37%;P<.0001)。QPL组患者提出更多预后相关问题(比例为2.3;95%CI为1.3至4.0;P=.004),讨论了更多预后相关(比例为1.43;95%CI为1.1至1.8,P=.003)及临终问题(30%对10%;P=.001)。QPL组患者对未来未满足的信息需求较少(21=4.14;P=.04),而这是未满足信息需求最大的领域。QPL组会诊(平均38分钟)比对照组(平均31分钟)更长(P=.002)。两组在焦虑或患者/医生满意度方面未观察到差异。

结论

提供QPL并由医生认可其使用有助于晚期癌症患者及其护理人员提问,并促进关于预后和临终问题的讨论,而不会引起患者焦虑或降低满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验