Walczak Adam, Mazer Benjamin, Butow Phyllis N, Tattersall Martin H N, Clayton Josephine M, Davidson Patricia M, Young Jane, Ladwig Susan, Epstein Ronald M
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;27(8):779-88. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483659. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
Clinicians and patients find prognosis and end-of-life care discussions challenging. Misunderstanding one's prognosis can contribute to poor decision-making and end-of-life quality of life. A question prompt list (booklet of questions patients can ask clinicians) targeting these issues may help overcome communication barriers. None exists for end-of-life discussions outside the palliative care setting.
To develop/pilot a question prompt list facilitating discussion/planning of end-of-life care for oncology patients with advanced cancer from Australia and the United States and to explore acceptability, perceived benefits/challenges of using the question prompt list, suggestions for improvements and the necessity of country-specific adaptations.
An expert panel developed a question prompt list targeting prognosis and end-of-life issues. Australian/US semi-structured interviews and one focus group elicited feedback about the question prompt list. Transcribed data were analysed using qualitative methods.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four patients with advanced cancer (15 Australian/19 US) and 13 health professionals treating such patients (7 Australian/6 US) from two Australian and one US cancer centre participated.
Most endorsed the entire question prompt list, though a minority queried the utility/appropriateness of some questions. Analysis identified four global themes: (1) reinforcement of known benefits of question prompt lists, (2) appraisal of content and suggestions for further developments, (3) perceived benefits and challenges in using the question prompt list and (4) contrasts in Australian/US feedback. These contrasts necessitated distinct Australian/US final versions of the question prompt list.
Participants endorsed the question prompt list as acceptable and useful. Feedback resulted in two distinct versions of the question prompt list, accommodating differences between Australian and US approaches to end-of-life discussions, highlighting the appropriateness of tailoring communication aides to individual populations.
临床医生和患者发现预后及临终关怀讨论颇具挑战性。对自身预后的误解可能导致决策不当以及临终生活质量下降。一份针对这些问题的问题提示清单(患者可向临床医生提问的问题手册)或许有助于克服沟通障碍。在姑息治疗环境之外,尚无针对临终讨论的此类清单。
制定/试行一份问题提示清单,以促进澳大利亚和美国晚期癌症肿瘤患者的临终关怀讨论/规划,并探讨其可接受性、使用该问题提示清单的感知益处/挑战、改进建议以及针对特定国家进行调整的必要性。
一个专家小组制定了一份针对预后和临终问题的问题提示清单。通过澳大利亚/美国的半结构化访谈和一个焦点小组收集了关于该问题提示清单的反馈。使用定性方法对转录数据进行分析。
地点/参与者:来自两个澳大利亚癌症中心和一个美国癌症中心的34名晚期癌症患者(15名澳大利亚患者/19名美国患者)以及13名治疗此类患者的医护人员(7名澳大利亚医护人员/6名美国医护人员)参与了研究。
大多数人认可整个问题提示清单,不过少数人对某些问题的实用性/恰当性提出了质疑。分析确定了四个总体主题:(1)对问题提示清单已知益处的强化,(2)对内容的评估及进一步发展的建议,(3)使用问题提示清单的感知益处和挑战,(4)澳大利亚/美国反馈的差异。这些差异使得问题提示清单有了澳大利亚/美国两个不同的最终版本。
参与者认可该问题提示清单是可接受且有用的。反馈产生了两个不同版本的问题提示清单,以适应澳大利亚和美国在临终讨论方式上的差异,凸显了根据不同人群定制沟通辅助工具的恰当性。