Patel R, Blake G M, Fogelman I
Academic Bone Densitometry Unit, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St. Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2007 Feb;80(2):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s00223-006-0217-x. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
The aim of this study was to determine whether forearm bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are affected by clinical risk factors for osteoporosis to the same extent as spine and hip BMD. The study population consisted of 1,009 female patients and volunteers, of whom 238 were premenopausal. Women were placed into seven groups according to which clinical risk factor they had (women could be placed in more than one group): (1) atraumatic fracture since the age of 25 years, (2) report of X-ray osteopenia, (3) predisposing medical condition or use of therapy known to affect bone metabolism, (4) premature menopause before the age of 45 years or a history of amenorrhea of longer than 6 months' duration, (5) family history of osteoporosis, (6) body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m(2), and (7) current smoking habit. Forearm BMD was measured using an Osteometer DTX-200 peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanner, and spine and hip BMD measurements were obtained on a Hologic QDR-4500 scanner. Manufacturers' reference ranges were used to calculate Z scores for the spine and forearm, and the NHANES III reference range was used to calculate Z scores for the hip. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the mean decrease in Z score associated with each clinical risk factor. The Z-score reductions associated with the seven risk factors were similar for forearm and central BMD measurements. For forearm measurements, Z-score decreases associated with a history of atraumatic fracture (-0.25), a medical condition or therapy known to affect bone metabolism (-0.26), premature menopause or history of amenorrhea (-0.30), and BMI <20 kg/m(2) (-0.82) were all statistically significantly different from zero (P < 0.05). With an increasing number of risk factors in each individual, the mean Z score at each measurement site became progressively more negative. In conclusion, clinical risk factors for low BMD affect forearm BMD measurements to a similar extent as central BMD.
本研究的目的是确定前臂骨密度(BMD)测量是否与脊柱和髋部BMD一样,受到骨质疏松症临床风险因素的同等程度影响。研究人群包括1009名女性患者和志愿者,其中238名处于绝经前。根据她们所具有的临床风险因素,女性被分为七组(女性可能被分入不止一组):(1)25岁以后发生的非创伤性骨折;(2)X线显示骨质减少的报告;(3)已知会影响骨代谢的易患疾病或治疗方法的使用;(4)45岁之前的过早绝经或闭经超过6个月的病史;(5)骨质疏松症家族史;(6)体重指数(BMI)<20 kg/m²;(7)当前的吸烟习惯。使用Osteometer DTX - 200外周双能X线吸收仪扫描仪测量前臂BMD,并在Hologic QDR - 4500扫描仪上获得脊柱和髋部BMD测量值。使用制造商的参考范围来计算脊柱和前臂的Z评分,使用美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)III参考范围来计算髋部的Z评分。多变量回归分析用于估计与每个临床风险因素相关的Z评分的平均降低值。对于前臂和中央BMD测量,与七个风险因素相关的Z评分降低情况相似。对于前臂测量,与非创伤性骨折病史(-0.25)、已知会影响骨代谢的疾病或治疗方法(-0.26)、过早绝经或闭经病史(-0.30)以及BMI <20 kg/m²(-0.82)相关的Z评分降低均与零有统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。随着每个个体风险因素数量的增加,每个测量部位的平均Z评分逐渐变得更负。总之,低BMD的临床风险因素对前臂BMD测量的影响程度与对中央BMD的影响程度相似。