Suppr超能文献

掌指骨骨密度评估系统的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of a phalangeal bone mineral density assessment system.

机构信息

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Division of Surgery, Academic Bone Densitometry Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2010 Jul-Sep;13(3):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

Abstract

Because osteoporosis is common and usually managed in primary care, there is a requirement for cheap and convenient methods of measuring bone mineral density (BMD). AccuDEXA (Lone Oak Medical Technologies, Doylestown, PA) is a tabletop dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) device that performs BMD measurements of the hand in the middle phalanges of the third finger. The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the use of AccuDEXA in UK women; (2) investigate the concordance between AccuDEXA T-scores and DXA T-scores for central (spine and hip) sites; (3) investigate the comparative response of AccuDEXA measurements to clinical risk factors for osteoporosis. Measurements of phalangeal and central BMD were performed in 620 women referred by their family doctors for bone densitometry (group 1) and 159 healthy female volunteers (group 2). For 65 women in group 2, aged 39 yr or younger, the mean Z-scores for AccuDEXA and the central sites calculated from US reference ranges were consistent with the expected value of 0, whereas for the 62 group 2 women, aged 50 yr or older, the mean Z-scores for AccuDEXA and the central sites were in the range 0.4-0.7 and were statistically significantly different from 0. In both group 1 and group 2, the AccuDEXA T-scores in older and younger women were systematically higher than those in the central sites by up to 1 unit. Of the 157 women aged 50 yr or older, with osteoporosis, based on their central DXA results, only 34 (22%) had an AccuDEXA T-score less than or equal to -2.5, whereas 76 (48%) had osteopenia and 47 (30%) were normal based on their AccuDEXA T-scores. When assessed by the effect of clinical risk factors on Z-scores, both AccuDEXA and central BMD were affected to a similar extent. We conclude that the conventional World Health Organisation T-score criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis should not be applied to AccuDEXA measurements in UK women. Clinical risk factors for low BMD were found to affect AccuDEXA measurements to a similar extent as central BMD measurements. AccuDEXA measurements could, therefore, provide an alternative method for identifying individuals with low bone mass, provided care is taken in interpreting T-scores, perhaps, through the use of device-specific thresholds.

摘要

由于骨质疏松症较为常见,且通常在初级保健中进行管理,因此需要一种廉价且方便的骨密度(BMD)测量方法。AccuDEXA(Lone Oak Medical Technologies,宾夕法尼亚州多伊尔斯敦)是一种台式双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)设备,可对第三指中节的指骨进行 BMD 测量。本研究的目的是:(1)评估 AccuDEXA 在英国女性中的应用;(2)研究 AccuDEXA T 评分与中央(脊柱和髋部)部位 DXA T 评分的一致性;(3)研究 AccuDEXA 测量值对骨质疏松症临床危险因素的比较反应。由家庭医生转诊进行骨密度测定的 620 名女性(第 1 组)和 159 名健康女性志愿者(第 2 组)进行了指骨和中央部位的 BMD 测量。对于第 2 组中 65 名年龄在 39 岁或以下的女性,AccuDEXA 和美国参考范围计算的中央部位的平均 Z 评分与 0 的预期值一致,而对于第 2 组中 62 名年龄在 50 岁或以上的女性,AccuDEXA 和中央部位的平均 Z 评分在 0.4-0.7 范围内,与 0 有统计学差异。在第 1 组和第 2 组中,年龄较大和较小的女性的 AccuDEXA T 评分比中央部位高 1 个单位。在 157 名年龄在 50 岁或以上、基于中央 DXA 结果诊断为骨质疏松症的女性中,只有 34 名(22%)的 AccuDEXA T 评分小于或等于-2.5,而 76 名(48%)为骨量减少,47 名(30%)为正常。根据临床危险因素对 Z 评分的影响评估,AccuDEXA 和中央 BMD 均受到相似程度的影响。我们得出结论,用于诊断骨质疏松症的传统世界卫生组织 T 评分标准不应应用于英国女性的 AccuDEXA 测量值。低 BMD 的临床危险因素对 AccuDEXA 测量值的影响与中央 BMD 测量值相似。因此,AccuDEXA 测量值可以提供一种替代方法来识别低骨量个体,前提是在解释 T 评分时要小心,也许可以通过使用特定于设备的阈值来实现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验