Fraser Callum G, Mathew Catriona M, Mowat N Ashley G, Wilson John A, Carey Francis A, Steele Robert J C
Scottish Bowel Screening Centre Laboratory, Kings Cross, Dundee DD3 8EA, UK.
Gut. 2007 Oct;56(10):1415-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.119651. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
The guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) has been proved as a screening investigation for colorectal cancer, but has disadvantages. Newer faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have many advantages, but yield higher positivity rates and are expensive. A two-tier reflex follow-up of gFOBT-positive individuals with a FIT before colonoscopy has been advocated as an efficient and effective approach.
A new simple and stable card collection FIT was evaluated.
1124 individuals who were gFOBT positive were asked to provide samples. 558 individuals participated, 320 refused and 246 did not return samples. No evidence of sampling bias was found. 302 individuals tested FIT negative and 256 tested positive. In the 302 FIT-negative individuals, 2 (0.7%) had cancer and 12 (4.0%) had large or multiple (high-risk) adenomatous polyps. In contrast, of 254 positive individuals, 47 (18.5%) had cancer and 54 (21.3%) had high-risk polyps. 93 (30.8%) of the FIT-negative individuals had a normal colonoscopy, but only 34 (13.4%) of the FIT-positive individuals had no pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (and 95% CIs) for cancer were 95.9% (84.8 to 99.3), 59.2% (54.7 to 63.5), 2.35 (2.08 to 2.65) and 0.07 (0.02 to 0.27), and for cancer and high-risk polyps were 87.8% (80.1 to 92.9), 65.3% (60.6 to 69.7), 2.53 (2.19 to 2.93) and 0.19 (0.11 to 0.31), respectively.
A two-tier reflex screening algorithm, in which gFOBT-positive participants are tested with a FIT, is effective in identifying individuals at high risk of significant colorectal neoplasia. This strategy is transferable across different FIT formats. This approach has been adopted for the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme.
愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)已被证明是一种用于结直肠癌的筛查方法,但存在缺点。新型粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)有许多优点,但阳性率较高且成本昂贵。有人提倡在结肠镜检查前对gFOBT阳性个体进行两级反射式随访,先进行FIT检测,这是一种高效且有效的方法。
对一种新型简单稳定的卡片式收集FIT进行了评估。
1124名gFOBT阳性个体被要求提供样本。558人参与,320人拒绝,246人未返回样本。未发现抽样偏差的证据。302人FIT检测为阴性,256人检测为阳性。在302名FIT阴性个体中,2人(0.7%)患有癌症,12人(4.0%)患有大的或多发(高危)腺瘤性息肉。相比之下,在254名阳性个体中,47人(18.5%)患有癌症,54人(21.3%)患有高危息肉。93名(30.8%)FIT阴性个体结肠镜检查正常,但FIT阳性个体中只有34人(13.4%)没有病变。癌症的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比(及95%置信区间)分别为95.9%(84.8至99.3)、59.2%(54.7至63.5)、2.35(2.08至2.65)和0.07(0.02至0.27),癌症和高危息肉的分别为87.8%(80.1至92.9)、65.3%(60.6至69.7)、2.53(2.19至2.93)和0.19(0.11至0.31)。
一种两级反射式筛查算法,即对gFOBT阳性参与者进行FIT检测,对于识别有显著结直肠肿瘤高风险的个体是有效的。这种策略可在不同的FIT形式中应用。这种方法已被苏格兰肠道筛查计划采用。