Selman Lucy, Harding Richard, Beynon Teresa, Hodson Fiona, Coady Elaine, Hazeldine Caroline, Walton Michael, Gibbs Louise, Higginson Irene J
Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London School of Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, UK.
Heart. 2007 Aug;93(8):963-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.106518. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
Although chronic heart failure (CHF) has a high mortality rate and symptom burden, and clinical guidance stipulates palliative care intervention, there is a lack of evidence to guide clinical practice for patients approaching the end of life.
(1) To formulate guidance and recommendations for improving end-of-life care in CHF; (2) to generate data on patients' and carers' preferences regarding future treatment modalities, and to investigate communication between staff, patients and carers on end-of-life issues.
Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 patients with CHF (New York Heart Association functional classification III-IV), 11 family carers, 6 palliative care clinicians and 6 cardiology clinicians.
A tertiary hospital in London, UK.
Patients and families reported a wide range of end-of-life care preferences. None had discussed these with their clinicians, and none was aware of choices or alternatives in future care modalities, such as adopting a palliative approach. Patients and carers live with fear and anxiety, and are uninformed about the implications of their diagnosis. Cardiac staff confirmed that they rarely raise such issues with patients. Disease- and specialism-specific barriers to improving end-of-life care were identified.
The novel, integrated data presented here provide three recommendations for improving care in line with policy directives: sensitive provision of information and discussion of end-of-life issues with patients and families; mutual education of cardiology and palliative care staff; and mutually agreed palliative care referral criteria and care pathways for patients with CHF.
尽管慢性心力衰竭(CHF)死亡率高且症状负担重,临床指南也规定了姑息治疗干预措施,但对于临终患者,仍缺乏指导临床实践的证据。
(1)制定改善CHF临终关怀的指南和建议;(2)收集患者及其照护者对未来治疗方式的偏好数据,并调查医护人员、患者及照护者之间关于临终问题的沟通情况。
对20例CHF患者(纽约心脏协会心功能分级III-IV级)、11名家庭照护者、6名姑息治疗临床医生和6名心脏病临床医生进行了半结构化定性访谈。
英国伦敦的一家三级医院。
患者和家属报告了广泛的临终关怀偏好。他们均未与临床医生讨论过这些偏好,也不知道未来护理方式的选择或替代方案,如采用姑息治疗方法。患者和照护者生活在恐惧和焦虑之中,且对其诊断的影响一无所知。心脏科医护人员证实,他们很少与患者提及此类问题。确定了改善临终关怀的疾病和专科特定障碍。
本文提出的数据新颖且全面,为依据政策指令改善护理提供了三项建议:向患者及其家属敏感地提供信息并讨论临终问题;心脏病科和姑息治疗医护人员相互培训;以及就CHF患者达成相互认可的姑息治疗转诊标准和护理路径。