Lendvai Dora, Zhan Yan, Kavalieratos Dio, Iannone Lynne, Akgün Kathleen M, Allen Larry A, Bekelman David, Ersek Mary, Goldstein Nathan E, Luhrs Carol, Feder Shelli
Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System (D.L., L.I., K.M.A) and Yale School of Medicine, West Haven, CT, USA.
Yale School of Nursing (Y.Z.), Orange, CT, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Jul;70(1):89-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.019. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Palliative care is a component of high-quality care for people with heart failure (HF). However, how best to deliver specialist palliative care (SPC) within ambulatory settings is unknown. Such information could help healthcare systems expand access to these services.
We aimed to understand the preferred components and characteristics of ambulatory SPC delivery for people with HF and their non-medical family caregivers, as well as to identify barriers to its utilization.
We conducted a qualitative descriptive study employing content analysis among people with HF and caregivers. We enrolled 20 participants with current use of ambulatory SPC from 3 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers.
The sample (N = 20; patients = 16, caregivers = 4) mean age was 64.3 years (standard deviation = 16.5 years), 80% were male, 85% were White, and 10% were Black. Participants valued three key components of ambulatory SPC: 1) providing comprehensive education about HF; 2) care coordination of medical and social services, and 3) serious illness conversations including discussions of goals of care, the selection of surrogate decision-makers, and the completion of advance directives and related documentation. For participants, important characteristics of ambulatory SPC delivery included 1) collaboration and communication among SPC and cardiology clinicians, 2) the accessibility and availability of the SPC team, and 3) flexibility in visit logistics. Barriers to engagement were conflating SPC with hospice, and logistical concerns with appointment delivering and scheduling.
People with HF and their caregivers prefer and value specific components and characteristics of ambulatory SPC. Implementation of ambulatory SPC should be educational, collaborative, and incorporate logistical preferences.
姑息治疗是心力衰竭(HF)患者高质量护理的一个组成部分。然而,在门诊环境中如何最好地提供专科姑息治疗(SPC)尚不清楚。此类信息有助于医疗保健系统扩大这些服务的可及性。
我们旨在了解HF患者及其非医疗家庭照护者对门诊SPC服务的首选组成部分和特征,并确定其使用障碍。
我们对HF患者和照护者进行了一项采用内容分析法的定性描述性研究。我们从3个退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心招募了20名当前正在使用门诊SPC的参与者。
样本(N = 20;患者 = 16,照护者 = 4)的平均年龄为64.3岁(标准差 = 16.5岁),80%为男性,85%为白人,10%为黑人。参与者重视门诊SPC的三个关键组成部分:1)提供有关HF的全面教育;2)医疗和社会服务的护理协调;3)重病谈话,包括护理目标的讨论、替代决策者的选择以及预先医疗指示和相关文件的完成。对参与者而言,门诊SPC服务的重要特征包括:1)SPC与心脏病学临床医生之间的协作与沟通;2)SPC团队的可及性和可用性;3)就诊安排的灵活性。参与的障碍包括将SPC与临终关怀混为一谈,以及预约安排和调度方面的后勤问题。
HF患者及其照护者更喜欢并重视门诊SPC的特定组成部分和特征。门诊SPC的实施应该具有教育性、协作性,并纳入后勤方面的偏好。