• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断和复发的急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中替尼泊苷处置和药效学的差异。

Differences in teniposide disposition and pharmacodynamics in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia.

作者信息

Evans W E, Rodman J H, Relling M V, Petros W P, Stewart C F, Pui C H, Rivera G K

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Jan;260(1):71-7.

PMID:1731053
Abstract

Teniposide, a widely used investigational anticancer drug, is extensively bound to plasma proteins (greater than 95%). The present study evaluated the clearance and pharmacodynamics of total and unbound teniposide in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia who were either in first complete remission or who had relapsed and achieved a subsequent complete remission. When compared to values of patients in first remission, the mean total systemic clearance of teniposide in relapsed patients was significantly lower at the time remission reinduction therapy was initiated, but increased to values greater than first remission patients after a subsequent remission was achieved. However, the mean clearance of unbound teniposide (ml/min/m2) was 3-fold lower in relapsed patients during reinduction therapy (1224 vs. 4261, P less than .0001), and improved but remained low after these patients achieved a subsequent remission (1965, P = .025). Changes in plasma protein binding accounted for the increase in total clearance when unbound clearance decreased. Continuous therapy with L-asparaginase was the major treatment difference in those patients with hypoalbuminemia and lower clearance of unbound teniposide. In 15 evaluable patients in complete remission, there was a statistically significant (P = .039) linear correlation between the percentage decrease in white blood cell count and the systemic exposure (AUC) to unbound teniposide, with higher exposure associated with a greater decrease in white blood cell count. There was not a significant correlation between the percent decrease in white blood cell count and the dosage given or the systemic exposure to total teniposide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

替尼泊苷是一种广泛使用的试验性抗癌药物,与血浆蛋白广泛结合(大于95%)。本研究评估了急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中总替尼泊苷和游离替尼泊苷的清除率及药效学,这些患者处于首次完全缓解期或复发后又获得完全缓解。与首次缓解期患者的值相比,复发患者在重新诱导缓解治疗开始时替尼泊苷的平均总全身清除率显著较低,但在随后获得缓解后增加至高于首次缓解期患者的值。然而,复发患者在重新诱导治疗期间游离替尼泊苷的平均清除率(ml/min/m²)低3倍(1224对4261,P小于0.0001),这些患者在随后获得缓解后虽有所改善但仍较低(1965,P = 0.025)。当游离清除率降低时,血浆蛋白结合的变化导致总清除率增加。连续使用L-天冬酰胺酶治疗是那些低白蛋白血症且游离替尼泊苷清除率较低患者的主要治疗差异。在15例可评估的完全缓解患者中,白细胞计数下降百分比与游离替尼泊苷的全身暴露量(AUC)之间存在统计学显著相关性(P = 0.039),暴露量越高,白细胞计数下降越大。白细胞计数下降百分比与给药剂量或总替尼泊苷的全身暴露量之间无显著相关性。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Differences in teniposide disposition and pharmacodynamics in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia.新诊断和复发的急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中替尼泊苷处置和药效学的差异。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Jan;260(1):71-7.
2
Variability in teniposide plasma protein binding is correlated with serum albumin concentrations.替尼泊苷血浆蛋白结合率的变异性与血清白蛋白浓度相关。
Pharmacotherapy. 1992;12(4):273-7.
3
Asparaginase may influence dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.天冬酰胺酶可能会影响急性淋巴细胞白血病中地塞米松的药代动力学。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8404.
4
Population pharmacokinetics of prednisolone in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿中泼尼松龙的群体药代动力学
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;51(6):465-73. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0602-3. Epub 2003 Apr 16.
5
Antimetabolite-based therapy in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report of POG study 9296.儿童T细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病的抗代谢物疗法:POG研究9296报告
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Feb;46(2):179-86. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20429.
6
Pharmacokinetics of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) in children with acute leukemia.克拉屈滨(2-氯脱氧腺苷)在儿童急性白血病中的药代动力学。
Cancer Res. 1994 Mar 1;54(5):1235-9.
7
Escalating teniposide systemic exposure to increase dose intensity for pediatric cancer patients.
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Feb;11(2):287-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.2.287.
8
[Effect of all-trans retinoic acid on the newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukaemia: our experience].[全反式维甲酸对新诊断急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效:我们的经验]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1995 Nov-Dec;123(11-12):279-85.
9
High-dose idarubicin in combination with Ara-C in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a pharmacokinetic and clinical study.大剂量伊达比星联合阿糖胞苷治疗复发或难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病患者:一项药代动力学和临床研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 May;59(6):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0332-4. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
10
Effectiveness of rubidomycin in induction therapy with vincristine, prednisone, and L-asparaginase for standard risk childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia: results of a Dutch phase III study (ALL V). A report on behalf of the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG).柔红霉素在长春新碱、泼尼松和L-天冬酰胺酶诱导治疗标准风险儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病中的疗效:一项荷兰III期研究(ALL V)的结果。代表荷兰儿童白血病研究组(DCLSG)的报告。
Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1989 Summer;11(2):125-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.化疗药物的药代动力学导向给药
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Nov;39(5):345-67. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200039050-00004.
2
Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.抗癌药物剂量个体化的自适应控制方法。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Apr;38(4):315-53. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200038040-00003.
3
Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.癌症化疗剂量个体化实用治疗指南。
Drugs. 1998 Dec;56(6):1019-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856060-00006.
4
Pharmacokinetic optimisation of cancer chemotherapy. Effect on outcomes.癌症化疗的药代动力学优化。对治疗结果的影响。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Apr;32(4):324-43. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732040-00005.
5
Epipodophyllotoxins in the treatment of childhood cancer.表鬼臼毒素在儿童癌症治疗中的应用。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34 Suppl:S89-95. doi: 10.1007/BF00684870.