Rassin Michal, Sruyah Ronit, Kahalon Ayelet, Naveh Reut, Nicar Irit, Silner Dina
Nursing Research Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zriffin, Be'er-Yaakov, Israel.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):76-82. doi: 10.1097/00003465-200703000-00010.
The goal of the study was to compare the reliability and validity of 3 Sedation Agitation Scale. Two nurses and a physician conducted 130 observations simultaneously. They found an excellent interrater reliability in the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (r>0.86), and high correlations between the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and the Sedation Agitation Scale and Visual Analog Scale scales (r=0.92, r=0.85). The research findings will help to assert Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale as a daily assessment tool in the intensive care unit, and it will pave the way for construction a sedation protocol according to the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale level.
该研究的目的是比较三种镇静躁动评分量表的可靠性和有效性。两名护士和一名医生同时进行了130次观察。他们发现里士满躁动镇静量表具有出色的评分者间信度（r>0.86），且里士满躁动镇静量表与镇静躁动量表和视觉模拟量表之间具有高度相关性（r=0.92，r=0.85）。研究结果将有助于确立里士满躁动镇静量表作为重症监护病房的日常评估工具，并为根据里士满躁动镇静量表水平制定镇静方案铺平道路。
