• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恩替卡韦与拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的双盲、双模拟、随机对照研究

[A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled study of entecavir versus lamivudine for treatment of chronic hepatitis B].

作者信息

Yao Guang-bi, Zhu Mei, Wang Yu-ming, Xu Dao-zhen, Tan De-ming, Chen Cheng-wei, Hou Jin-lin

机构信息

Clinical Immunology Research Center, Shanghai Jing An Qu Central Hospital, Shanghai 200040, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Nov;45(11):891-5.

PMID:17313873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was to evaluate the antiviral efficacy and safety in nucleoside naive Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with entecavir (ETV) or lamivadine (LVD).

METHODS

The trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy and control design. 519 nucleoside naive CHB patients were treated with daily dose of ETV 0.5 mg (258 patients) or LVD 100 mg (261 patients) for at least 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of HBV DNA < 0.7 MEq/ml by bDNA assay and ALT < 1.25 x ULN at week 48. HBV DNA levels were also measured by the Roche Cobas Amplicor(TM) PCR assay at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48. Clinical and laboratory adverse events were recorded every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. The primary end point were achieved in 90% of ETV treated patients versus 69% of LVD treated patients (P < 0.0001). The mean HBV DNA level decreased 5.9 lg copies/ml (by PCR assay) from baseline in ETV group versus 4.3 lg copies/ml in LVD group (P < 0.0001). The serum HBV DNA become undetectable (< 300 copies/ml by PCR) in 76% of ETV group versus 43% of LVD group (P < 0.0001). The normalization of ALT were 90% in ETV group versus 78% in LVD group (P = 0.0003). The difference of HBeAg seroconversion rates between this 2 groups (15% vs 18%) at week 48 was no statistically significant. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable: 60% of ETV patients and 56% of LVD patients reported AEs; and 3% of ETV patients and 5% of LVD patients reported serious AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

ETV achieves better virologic and biochemical improvements in nucleoside-naive patients with CHB while the safety profile is comparable to LVD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估恩替卡韦(ETV)或拉米夫定(LVD)治疗初治的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)中国患者的抗病毒疗效和安全性。

方法

该试验采用随机、双盲、双模拟和对照设计。519例初治的CHB患者接受每日剂量的ETV 0.5mg(258例患者)或LVD 100mg(261例患者)治疗至少52周。主要终点是在第48周时通过分支DNA分析法检测HBV DNA<0.7MEq/ml且ALT<1.25×ULN的复合终点。在第12、24、36和48周时也通过罗氏Cobas Amplicor™PCR分析法测量HBV DNA水平。每4周记录临床和实验室不良事件。

结果

治疗组之间的基线特征平衡良好。ETV治疗的患者中有90%达到主要终点,而LVD治疗的患者中这一比例为69%(P<0.0001)。ETV组的平均HBV DNA水平较基线下降了5.9lg拷贝/ml(通过PCR分析法),而LVD组下降了4.3lg拷贝/ml(P<0.0001)。ETV组中76%的患者血清HBV DNA变得不可检测(通过PCR<300拷贝/ml),而LVD组为43%(P<0.0001)。ETV组ALT正常化的比例为90%,LVD组为78%(P = 0.0003)。两组在第48周时HBeAg血清学转换率的差异(15%对18%)无统计学意义。不良事件(AE)的总体发生率相当:60%的ETV患者和56%的LVD患者报告了AE;3%的ETV患者和5%的LVD患者报告了严重AE。

结论

ETV在初治的CHB患者中实现了更好的病毒学和生化改善,同时安全性与LVD相当。

相似文献

1
[A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled study of entecavir versus lamivudine for treatment of chronic hepatitis B].恩替卡韦与拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的双盲、双模拟、随机对照研究
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Nov;45(11):891-5.
2
[Analysis of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, multicenter study confirmed the similar therapeutic efficacies of entecavir maleate and entecavir for treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B].一项随机、双盲、双模拟、对照、多中心研究的分析证实,马来酸恩替卡韦与恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效相似。
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;21(12):881-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2013.12.001.
3
[A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, multicenter study of entecavir maleate versus entecavir for treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: results at week 48].马来酸恩替卡韦与恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎的随机、双盲、双模拟、对照、多中心研究:48周结果
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Jul;20(7):512-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2012.07.007.
4
A 24-week, parallel-group, open-label, randomized clinical trial comparing the early antiviral efficacy of telbivudine and entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adult Chinese patients.一项 24 周、平行分组、开放性标签、随机临床试验,比较了替比夫定和恩替卡韦在治疗中国成年乙型肝炎 e 抗原阳性慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者中的早期抗病毒疗效。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):649-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.001.
5
Entecavir therapy for up to 96 weeks in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者长达96周。
Gastroenterology. 2007 Nov;133(5):1437-44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.025. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
6
[Entecavir resistance in entecavir naive lamivudine treated chronic hepatitis B patients].初治恩替卡韦的拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者中的恩替卡韦耐药性
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009 Jul;43(3):425-32.
7
[Entecavir 1.0mg monotherapy or entecavir plus adefovir dipivoxil for patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B had suboptimal response to lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil].[对于拉米夫定耐药的慢性乙型肝炎患者,恩替卡韦1.0毫克单药治疗或恩替卡韦联合阿德福韦酯对拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯的反应欠佳]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;19(11):828-32. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2011.11.009.
8
Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus lamivudine over 5 years of treatment: A randomized controlled trial in Korean patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B.恩替卡韦与拉米夫定治疗乙肝 e 抗原阴性慢性乙型肝炎 5 年的疗效和安全性:一项韩国患者的随机对照试验。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;23(4):331-339. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0040. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
9
A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.恩替卡韦与拉米夫定治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9;354(10):1001-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051285.
10
Efficacy and safety of entecavir in lamivudine-refractory patients with chronic hepatitis B: randomized controlled trial in Japanese patients.恩替卡韦治疗拉米夫定耐药慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效与安全性:日本患者的随机对照试验
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Sep;23(9):1320-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05455.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
HBeAg Seroconversion in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analog Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.接受长期核苷(酸)类似物治疗的HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的HBeAg血清学转换:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169444. eCollection 2017.
2
Dynamic Characteristics of Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Chinese Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving 7 Years of Entecavir Therapy.接受7年恩替卡韦治疗的中国慢性乙型肝炎患者血清乙肝表面抗原的动态特征
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Apr 20;129(8):929-35. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179802.
3
What MELD score mandates use of entecavir for ACLF-HBV HBeAg-negative patients?
MELD 评分对 ACLF-HBV HBeAg 阴性患者使用恩替卡韦有何规定?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 7;18(33):4604-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4604.
4
Recent data on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogues.核苷(酸)类似物治疗慢性乙型肝炎的最新数据。
Hepatol Int. 2008 Jun;2(2):163-78. doi: 10.1007/s12072-008-9061-6. Epub 2008 Mar 4.