• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于腰椎后路椎间融合稳定的B型双节段可扩张脊柱椎间融合器:力学测试

B-twin expandable spinal spacer for posterior lumbar interbody stabilization: mechanical testing.

作者信息

Folman Yoram, Shabat Shay, Gepstein Reuven

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Hillel Yaffe MC, Hadera 38100, Israel.

出版信息

J Surg Orthop Adv. 2006 Winter;15(4):203-8.

PMID:17313932
Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion is an accepted surgical technique to treat disabling lower back pain due to degenerative disc disease. In the techniques that prevail, installation of large fixed-size twin cages dictate the sacrifice of the posterior stabilizing structures. Moreover, excessive retraction of the dural sac imposes potential neurological hazard. The authors present a novel technique based on a spacer capable of threefold expansion once it has been installed in the disc space. The spacer was laboratory tested under controlled loading conditions. Strength and fatigue tests of an isolated spacer were performed using an artificial model. Pullout resistance and ultimate compression strength of the surgical construct were evaluated using a cadaveric specimen. The yield force and the ultimate force for the single spacer averaged 2660 +/- 483 N and 4313 +/- 420 N, respectively, while the endurance limit at 5 million cycles averaged 931 N. The single-spacer resistance to pullout averaged 556 +/- 207 N, while the ultimate compressive strength of bone-spacer interface averaged 3399 +/- 136 N for a pair of spacers. The results of the study indicate that the B-twin ESS is expected to withstand the loads imposed upon it during everyday activity and resist migration or significant subsidence until fusion is achieved.

摘要

腰椎后路椎间融合术是一种公认的治疗因椎间盘退变疾病导致的致残性下腰痛的外科技术。在现有的技术中,安装大型固定尺寸的双椎间融合器需要牺牲后方稳定结构。此外,过度牵拉硬脊膜囊会带来潜在的神经风险。作者提出了一种新技术,该技术基于一种椎间融合器,这种融合器在安装到椎间盘间隙后能够进行三倍扩展。该椎间融合器在实验室可控加载条件下进行了测试。使用人工模型对单个椎间融合器进行了强度和疲劳测试。使用尸体标本评估了手术结构的拔出阻力和极限抗压强度。单个椎间融合器的屈服力和极限力平均分别为2660±483 N和4313±420 N,而在500万次循环时的疲劳极限平均为931 N。单个椎间融合器的拔出阻力平均为556±207 N,而一对椎间融合器的骨 - 椎间融合器界面的极限抗压强度平均为3399±136 N。研究结果表明,预计B型双椎间扩展支撑系统(B-twin ESS)能够承受日常活动中施加于其上的负荷,并在融合实现之前抵抗移位或显著下沉。

相似文献

1
B-twin expandable spinal spacer for posterior lumbar interbody stabilization: mechanical testing.用于腰椎后路椎间融合稳定的B型双节段可扩张脊柱椎间融合器:力学测试
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2006 Winter;15(4):203-8.
2
Resistance of the lumbar spine against axial compression forces after implantation of three different posterior lumbar interbody cages.三种不同的后路腰椎椎间融合器植入后腰椎对轴向压缩力的抵抗力。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001 Dec;143(12):1217-22. doi: 10.1007/s007010100017.
3
An in vitro biomechanical investigation: variable positioning of leopard carbon fiber interbody cages.一项体外生物力学研究:豹纹碳纤维椎间融合器的可变定位
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):442-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181568637.
4
Percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the B-twin expandable spinal spacer.使用B型双扩张式椎间融合器进行经皮后路腰椎椎间融合术。
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;48(6):330-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915605.
5
Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.骨质疏松性腰椎的初次椎弓根螺钉强化:椎弓根固定强度的生物力学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 1;32(10):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261566.38422.40.
6
Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.增强腰椎前路椎间融合术的稳定性:前路钢板与后路经椎弓根内固定器械的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):E38-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181604644.
7
Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.腰椎椎弓根螺钉的皮质骨轨迹
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
8
Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.使用锥形或圆柱形椎间融合器进行前路椎间融合术后腰椎椎间孔的变化。
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.019. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
9
Dorsal lumbar interbody fusion for chronic axial, mechanical low back pain: a modification of two established techniques.用于慢性轴性机械性下腰痛的腰椎后路椎间融合术:两种成熟技术的改良
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS102-6; discussion ONS106-7. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000335023.91240.80.
10
Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.椎间融合器终板接触对运动节段生物力学的影响。
Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):564-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Laterally Placed Expandable versus Static Interbody Spacers: A 1-Year Follow-Up Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study.外侧放置的可扩张椎间融合器与静态椎间融合器的比较有效性:一项为期1年的随访影像学和临床结果研究。
Asian Spine J. 2021 Feb;15(1):89-96. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0260. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
2
In Vitro Biomechanical and Fluoroscopic Study of a Continuously Expandable Interbody Spacer Concerning Its Role in Insertion Force and Segmental Kinematics.关于一种可连续扩张椎间融合器在插入力和节段运动学中作用的体外生物力学与透视研究
Asian Spine J. 2018 Aug;12(4):601-610. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.601. Epub 2018 Jul 27.