MacLaren Robert, Forrest Laurel K, Kiser Tyree H
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Mar;27(3):351-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.3.351.
To determine if adjunctive dexmedetomidine therapy in intensive care patients alters requirements for and levels of sedation and analgesia, and to describe hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters.
Retrospective, noncontrolled, descriptive study of clinical practice.
Four intensive care units (ICUs; medical, surgical, neurosurgical, or burn) in a university-affiliated medical center.
Forty patients who were already receiving sustained use of propofol, lorazepam, or fentanyl when dexmedetomidine was started.
Medical records were identified by searching the pharmacy database for patients who had received continuous-infusion dexmedetomidine from January 2000-January 2003 while in one of the four ICUs. Primary end points were discontinuation or dosage reduction of other sedatives or fentanyl from the hour before to 6 hours after starting dexmedetomidine. Other outcomes included levels of sedation and analgesia before and after dexmedetomidine and description of ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters. The initial dexmedetomidine rate of 0.4 +/- 0.25 microg/kg/hour changed minimally through 47.4 +/- 61.1 infusion hours. At 6 hours, 11 of 13 patients receiving propofol, 14 of 23 receiving lorazepam, and 4 of 30 receiving fentanyl had the respective agent discontinued. With dexmedetomidine, the hourly rates and cumulative daily doses were reduced only for propofol. Adequate sedation occurred at rates of 64.6% and 47.9% during the 24-hour periods before and after dexmedetomidine was started, respectively (p=0.001). Four and 12 patients had severe agitation before and after, respectively (p=0.05). One and 12 patients had severe pain before and after, respectively (p=0.02). Nine patients experienced hypotension or bradycardia. Twenty-two patients were successfully extubated within 24 hours of starting dexmedetomidine.
Adjunctive dexmedetomidine reduces sedative requirements but does not alter analgesic requirements. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with enhanced agitation, severe pain, and hemodynamic compromise. Transitioning to dexmedetomidine from other sedatives and analgesics may not provide optimal sedation and analgesia. Future studies are needed to evaluate dexmedetomidine as a bridge to extubation.
确定重症监护患者辅助使用右美托咪定治疗是否会改变镇静和镇痛的需求及水平,并描述血流动力学和通气参数。
对临床实践的回顾性、非对照、描述性研究。
一所大学附属医院医疗中心的四个重症监护病房(ICU;内科、外科、神经外科或烧伤科)。
40例在开始使用右美托咪定时已持续使用丙泊酚、劳拉西泮或芬太尼的患者。
通过检索药房数据库,确定2000年1月至2003年1月期间在四个ICU之一接受持续输注右美托咪定的患者的病历。主要终点是从开始使用右美托咪定前1小时至开始后6小时其他镇静剂或芬太尼的停用或剂量减少。其他结果包括使用右美托咪定前后的镇静和镇痛水平以及通气和血流动力学参数的描述。右美托咪定的初始输注速率为0.4±0.25微克/千克/小时,在47.4±61.1小时的输注过程中变化极小。6小时时,13例使用丙泊酚的患者中有11例、23例使用劳拉西泮的患者中有14例、30例使用芬太尼的患者中有4例分别停用了相应药物。使用右美托咪定后,仅丙泊酚的每小时输注速率和每日累积剂量有所降低。在开始使用右美托咪定前和后的24小时内,充分镇静的发生率分别为64.6%和47.9%(p = 0.00)。前后分别有4例和12例患者出现严重躁动(p = 0.05)。前后分别有1例和12例患者出现严重疼痛(p = 0.02)。9例患者出现低血压或心动过缓。22例患者在开始使用右美托咪定后24小时内成功拔管。
辅助使用右美托咪定可降低镇静需求,但不会改变镇痛需求。然而,右美托咪定与躁动加剧、严重疼痛和血流动力学不稳定有关。从其他镇静剂和镇痛药转换为右美托咪定可能无法提供最佳的镇静和镇痛效果。未来需要进行研究以评估右美托咪定作为拔管过渡药物的效果。