• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACTION研究:一项随机、开放标签、多中心试验,比较每日一次的硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊(阿维扎)与每日两次的盐酸羟考酮控释片(奥施康定)治疗慢性中度至重度下腰痛的效果。

The ACTION study: a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing once-a-day extended-release morphine sulfate capsules (AVINZA) to twice-a-day controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride tablets (OxyContin) for the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe low back pain.

作者信息

Rauck Richard L, Bookbinder Stephen A, Bunker Timothy R, Alftine Christopher D, Ghalie Richard, Negro-Vilar Andres, de Jong Egbert, Gershon Steven

机构信息

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Opioid Manag. 2006 May-Jun;2(3):155-66. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0025.

DOI:10.5055/jom.2006.0025
PMID:17319449
Abstract

This large, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study compared two oral sustained-release opioids (SROs)--AVINZA (A-MQD), morphine sulfate extended-release capsules given once a day, and OxyContin (O-ER), oxycodone modified-release tablets given twice a day--in SRO-naive subjects ages 30 to 70 with chronic, moderate to severe low back pain. Of the 392 subjects enrolled and randomized, 266 (132 in the A-MQD group and 134 in the O-ER group) completed the opioid dose titration phase and entered an eight-week evaluation phase. During the evaluation phase, A-MQD achieved significantly better pain control than O-ER, as demonstrated by a greater decrease from baseline in pain scores obtained four times daily during weeks one, four, and eight (p = 0.002). The number of breakthrough-pain rescue medication doses adjusted for the number of patient days was significantly lower in the A-MQD group (p < 0.0001). Better pain control with A-MQD was achieved with a significantly lower daily opioid dose than with O-ER (mean 69.9 mg and 91 mg morphine equivalents, respectively; p = 0.0125). Quality of sleep was significantly better with A-MQD for the entire evaluation phase (p = 0.0026). The incidence and severity of elicited opioid side effects were similar in the two groups. This trial demonstrated that once-daily A-MQD provides consistent around-the-clock pain relief in patients with low back pain. In patients who completed opioid dose titration, A-MQD was significantly better than O-ER for reducing pain and improving sleep, while requiring a lower daily opioid dose.

摘要

这项大型、开放标签、随机、平行组、多中心研究比较了两种口服缓释阿片类药物(SRO)——AVINZA(A-MQD,硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊,每日给药一次)和奥施康定(O-ER,羟考酮缓释片,每日给药两次),研究对象为30至70岁、初用SRO、患有慢性中重度下腰痛的患者。在392名入组并随机分组的受试者中,266名(A-MQD组132名,O-ER组134名)完成了阿片类药物剂量滴定阶段并进入为期八周的评估阶段。在评估阶段,A-MQD在疼痛控制方面显著优于O-ER,在第1、4和8周每天四次获得的疼痛评分较基线的降幅更大即证明了这一点(p = 0.002)。根据患者天数调整后的突破性疼痛解救药物剂量数量在A-MQD组显著更低(p < 0.0001)。A-MQD以显著低于O-ER的每日阿片类药物剂量实现了更好的疼痛控制(分别为平均69.9毫克和91毫克吗啡当量;p = 0.0125)。在整个评估阶段,A-MQD组的睡眠质量显著更好(p = 0.0026)。两组中引发的阿片类药物副作用的发生率和严重程度相似。该试验表明,每日一次的A-MQD可为下腰痛患者提供持续的全天候疼痛缓解。在完成阿片类药物剂量滴定的患者中,A-MQD在减轻疼痛和改善睡眠方面显著优于O-ER,同时所需的每日阿片类药物剂量更低。

相似文献

1
The ACTION study: a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing once-a-day extended-release morphine sulfate capsules (AVINZA) to twice-a-day controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride tablets (OxyContin) for the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe low back pain.ACTION研究:一项随机、开放标签、多中心试验,比较每日一次的硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊(阿维扎)与每日两次的盐酸羟考酮控释片(奥施康定)治疗慢性中度至重度下腰痛的效果。
J Opioid Manag. 2006 May-Jun;2(3):155-66. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0025.
2
A randomized, open-label study of once-a-day AVINZA (morphine sulfate extended-release capsules) versus twice-a-day OxyContin (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets) for chronic low back pain: the extension phase of the ACTION trial.一项关于每日一次服用阿维扎(硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊)与每日两次服用奥施康定(盐酸羟考酮控释片)治疗慢性下腰痛的随机、开放标签研究:ACTION试验的延长期。
J Opioid Manag. 2006 Nov-Dec;2(6):325-8, 331-3. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0048.
3
A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing once-a-day AVINZA (morphine sulfate extended-release capsules) versus twice-a-day OxyContin (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets) for the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe low back pain: improved physical functioning in the ACTION trial.一项随机、开放标签、多中心试验,比较每日一次的奥施康定(硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊)与每日两次的奥施康定(盐酸羟考酮控释片)治疗慢性中度至重度下腰痛的疗效:ACTION试验中身体功能的改善。
J Opioid Manag. 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):35-43. doi: 10.5055/jom.2007.0037.
4
Sleep improves when patients with chronic OA pain are managed with morning dosing of once a day extended-release morphine sulfate (AVINZA): findings from a pilot study.当慢性骨关节炎疼痛患者采用每日一次的硫酸吗啡缓释片(奥施康定)晨起给药进行治疗时,睡眠情况得到改善:一项试点研究的结果。
J Opioid Manag. 2007 May-Jun;3(3):145-54. doi: 10.5055/jom.2007.0052.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain: results of a 6-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority analysis.每日一次的奥施康定(OROS 氢吗啡酮)与每日两次的缓释羟考酮治疗慢性中重度骨关节炎疼痛患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 6 周的随机、开放标签、非劣效性分析结果
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):874-888. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.016.
6
Efficacy and safety of oxymorphone extended release in chronic low back pain: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III study.羟考酮缓释片治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照及活性药物对照的III期研究结果
J Pain. 2005 Jan;6(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.005.
7
Tolerability, Safety, and Effectiveness of Oxycodone DETERx in Elderly Patients ≥65 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.羟考酮DETERx在≥65岁慢性下腰痛老年患者中的耐受性、安全性及有效性:一项随机对照试验
Drugs Aging. 2017 Aug;34(8):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0473-7.
8
Randomized trial comparing polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate to controlled-release oxycodone HCl in moderate to severe nonmalignant pain.比较聚合物包衣缓释硫酸吗啡与盐酸羟考酮控释片治疗中重度非恶性疼痛的随机试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1503-14. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115603.
9
A study of AVINZA (morphine sulfate extended-release capsules) for chronic moderate-to-severe noncancer pain conducted under real-world treatment conditions--the ACCPT Study.一项在实际治疗条件下开展的关于AVINZA(硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊)用于慢性中重度非癌性疼痛的研究——ACCPT研究。
Pain Pract. 2006 Dec;6(4):254-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00094.x.
10
Multicenter, open-label, prospective evaluation of the conversion from previous opioid analgesics to extended-release hydromorphone hydrochloride administered every 24 hours to patients with persistent moderate to severe pain.多中心、开放标签、前瞻性评估:将既往使用阿片类镇痛药的持续性中度至重度疼痛患者转换为每24小时服用一次盐酸氢吗啡酮缓释剂的情况。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Nanoparticle Therapeutics in Clinical Perspective: Classification, Marketed Products, and Regulatory Landscape.临床视角下的纳米颗粒疗法:分类、上市产品及监管格局
Small. 2025 Jun 2:e2502315. doi: 10.1002/smll.202502315.
2
Natural product-based nanotechnological formulations for colorectal cancer treatment.用于结直肠癌治疗的基于天然产物的纳米技术制剂
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04175-y.
3
Are Opioids Needed to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain? A Review of Treatment Options and Analgesics in Development.
治疗慢性下腰痛需要使用阿片类药物吗?对治疗选择和正在研发的镇痛药的综述。
J Pain Res. 2020 May 14;13:1007-1022. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S226483. eCollection 2020.
4
Marketed New Drug Delivery Systems for Opioid Agonists/Antagonists Administration: A Rapid Overview.用于阿片类激动剂/拮抗剂给药的上市新药递送系统:快速概述。
Addict Health. 2016 Apr;8(2):115-122.
5
The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.期刊影响因子、报告冲突及报告资金来源对背痛试验标准化效应量的影响:一项系统评价与Meta回归分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 30;16:370. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0825-6.
6
[Opioids for noncancer pain in the elderly].[老年人非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物治疗]
Schmerz. 2015 Aug;29(4):380-401. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0029-x.
7
[Opioids in chronic noncancer pain-are opioids different? A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized head-to-head comparisons of opioids of at least four week's duration].[慢性非癌性疼痛中的阿片类药物——阿片类药物有区别吗?对至少为期四周的阿片类药物随机直接比较中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行的系统评价与荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1432-4.
8
Long-term opioid treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain: unproven efficacy and neglected safety?长期阿片类药物治疗慢性非恶性疼痛:疗效未经证实且安全性被忽视?
J Pain Res. 2013 Jul 4;6:513-29. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S47182. Print 2013.
9
Opioids in chronic musculoskeletal conditions.慢性肌肉骨骼疾病中的阿片类药物。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010 Oct;2(5):291-7. doi: 10.1177/1759720X10370237.
10
Pain sensitivity and opioid analgesia: a pharmacogenomic twin study.疼痛敏感性和阿片类镇痛药:一项基于药物基因组学的双胞胎研究。
Pain. 2012 Jul;153(7):1397-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 Mar 22.