Rauck Richard L, Bookbinder Stephen A, Bunker Timothy R, Alftine Christopher D, Ghalie Richard, Negro-Vilar Andres, de Jong Egbert, Gershon Steven
Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Opioid Manag. 2006 May-Jun;2(3):155-66. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0025.
This large, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study compared two oral sustained-release opioids (SROs)--AVINZA (A-MQD), morphine sulfate extended-release capsules given once a day, and OxyContin (O-ER), oxycodone modified-release tablets given twice a day--in SRO-naive subjects ages 30 to 70 with chronic, moderate to severe low back pain. Of the 392 subjects enrolled and randomized, 266 (132 in the A-MQD group and 134 in the O-ER group) completed the opioid dose titration phase and entered an eight-week evaluation phase. During the evaluation phase, A-MQD achieved significantly better pain control than O-ER, as demonstrated by a greater decrease from baseline in pain scores obtained four times daily during weeks one, four, and eight (p = 0.002). The number of breakthrough-pain rescue medication doses adjusted for the number of patient days was significantly lower in the A-MQD group (p < 0.0001). Better pain control with A-MQD was achieved with a significantly lower daily opioid dose than with O-ER (mean 69.9 mg and 91 mg morphine equivalents, respectively; p = 0.0125). Quality of sleep was significantly better with A-MQD for the entire evaluation phase (p = 0.0026). The incidence and severity of elicited opioid side effects were similar in the two groups. This trial demonstrated that once-daily A-MQD provides consistent around-the-clock pain relief in patients with low back pain. In patients who completed opioid dose titration, A-MQD was significantly better than O-ER for reducing pain and improving sleep, while requiring a lower daily opioid dose.
这项大型、开放标签、随机、平行组、多中心研究比较了两种口服缓释阿片类药物(SRO)——AVINZA(A-MQD,硫酸吗啡缓释胶囊,每日给药一次)和奥施康定(O-ER,羟考酮缓释片,每日给药两次),研究对象为30至70岁、初用SRO、患有慢性中重度下腰痛的患者。在392名入组并随机分组的受试者中,266名(A-MQD组132名,O-ER组134名)完成了阿片类药物剂量滴定阶段并进入为期八周的评估阶段。在评估阶段,A-MQD在疼痛控制方面显著优于O-ER,在第1、4和8周每天四次获得的疼痛评分较基线的降幅更大即证明了这一点(p = 0.002)。根据患者天数调整后的突破性疼痛解救药物剂量数量在A-MQD组显著更低(p < 0.0001)。A-MQD以显著低于O-ER的每日阿片类药物剂量实现了更好的疼痛控制(分别为平均69.9毫克和91毫克吗啡当量;p = 0.0125)。在整个评估阶段,A-MQD组的睡眠质量显著更好(p = 0.0026)。两组中引发的阿片类药物副作用的发生率和严重程度相似。该试验表明,每日一次的A-MQD可为下腰痛患者提供持续的全天候疼痛缓解。在完成阿片类药物剂量滴定的患者中,A-MQD在减轻疼痛和改善睡眠方面显著优于O-ER,同时所需的每日阿片类药物剂量更低。