Suppr超能文献

青霉素过敏患者中特定头孢菌素的安全使用:一项荟萃分析。

Safe use of selected cephalosporins in penicillin-allergic patients: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pichichero Michael E, Casey Janet R

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Elmwood Pediatric Group, Otolaryngology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Mar;136(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent analysis of clinical data and a clearer understanding of the role of chemical structure in the development of cross-reactivity indicate that the increased risk of an allergic reaction to a cephalosporin in penicillin-allergic patients is smaller than previously postulated.

METHOD

Medline and EMBASE databases were searched with the keywords: cephalosporin, penicillin, allergy, and cross-sensitivity for the years 1960 through 2005. Among 219 articles retrieved, 9 served as source material for this evidence-based meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A significant increase in allergic reactions to cephalothin (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 5.5), cephaloridine (OR = 8.7; CI = 5.9 to 12.8), and cephalexin (OR = 5.8; CI = 3.6 to 9.2), and all first generation cephalosporins plus cefamandole (OR = 4.8; CI = 3.7 to 6.2) were observed in penicillin allergic patients; no increase was observed with second generation cephalosporins (OR = 1.1; CI, 0.6 to 2.1) or third generation cephalosporins (OR = 0.5; CI = 0.2 to 1.1). Clinical challenges, skin testing, and monoclonal antibody studies point to the paramount importance of similarities in side chain structure to predict cross-allergy between cephalosporins and penicillins.

CONCLUSION

First-generation cephalosporins have cross-allergy with penicillins, but cross-allergy is negligible with second- and third-generation cephalosporins. Particular emphasis should be placed on the role of chemical structure in determining the risk of cross-reactivity between specific agents.

摘要

背景

近期对临床数据的分析以及对化学结构在交叉反应发生过程中作用的更清晰理解表明,青霉素过敏患者对头孢菌素发生过敏反应的风险增加幅度小于先前推测。

方法

使用关键词“头孢菌素”“青霉素”“过敏”和“交叉敏感性”检索1960年至2005年期间的Medline和EMBASE数据库。在检索到的219篇文章中,9篇用作该循证荟萃分析的源材料。

结果

在青霉素过敏患者中,观察到对头孢噻吩(比值比[OR]=2.5;95%置信区间[CI]=1.1至5.5)、头孢噻啶(OR=8.7;CI=5.9至12.8)、头孢氨苄(OR=5.8;CI=3.6至9.2)以及所有第一代头孢菌素加头孢孟多(OR=4.8;CI=3.7至6.2)的过敏反应显著增加;而第二代头孢菌素(OR=1.1;CI,0.6至2.1)或第三代头孢菌素(OR=0.5;CI=0.2至1.1)未观察到增加。临床激发试验、皮肤试验和单克隆抗体研究表明,侧链结构相似性对于预测头孢菌素和青霉素之间的交叉过敏至关重要。

结论

第一代头孢菌素与青霉素存在交叉过敏,但第二代和第三代头孢菌素的交叉过敏可忽略不计。应特别强调化学结构在确定特定药物之间交叉反应风险中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验