Vermeulen Marian J, Schull Michael J
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1216-21. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259661.05525.9a. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) can be devastating, yet its initial presentation may be limited to common symptoms and subtle signs, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. Little is known about population rates of misdiagnosis of SAH, or hospital factors that may contribute to it. We estimated the population-based rate of missed SAH among emergency department (ED) patients and examined its relationship with hospital characteristics.
We studied persons admitted with a nontraumatic SAH to all Ontario hospitals over 3 years (April 2002 to March 2005). SAH was defined as missed if the patient had an ED visit related to the SAH (based on a prespecified definition) in the 14 days before admission. We examined the association between hospital teaching status and missed SAH and explored whether annual ED volume of SAH or CT availability explained this association.
Of 1507 patients diagnosed with SAH, 5.4% (95% CI, 4.3 to 6.6) had a missed diagnosis. The risk was significantly higher among patients triaged as low acuity (odds ratio 2.65; 95% CI, 1.46 to 4.80), as well as in nonteaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio 2.12; 95% CI, 1.02, 4.44). Neither ED SAH volume nor on-site CT availability explained the effect of teaching status.
About 1 in 20 SAH patients are missed during an ED visit. Lower acuity patients are at higher risk of misdiagnosis, suggesting the need for heightened suspicion among patients with minimal clinical findings. The risk is also greater in nonteaching hospitals, but this is not explained by the annual volume of SAHs seen in the ED or access to CT.
蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)可能具有毁灭性,但其初始表现可能仅限于常见症状和细微体征,这有可能导致误诊。关于SAH误诊的人群发生率或可能导致误诊的医院因素,我们知之甚少。我们估计了急诊科(ED)患者中基于人群的SAH漏诊率,并研究了其与医院特征的关系。
我们研究了在3年期间(2002年4月至2005年3月)入住安大略省所有医院的非创伤性SAH患者。如果患者在入院前14天内有与SAH相关的ED就诊(基于预先指定的定义),则SAH被定义为漏诊。我们研究了医院教学状况与SAH漏诊之间的关联,并探讨了SAH的年度ED就诊量或CT可用性是否可以解释这种关联。
在1507例被诊断为SAH的患者中,5.4%(95%CI,4.3至6.6)被漏诊。在被分诊为低急症的患者中,风险显著更高(优势比2.65;95%CI,1.46至4.80),在非教学医院也是如此(调整后的优势比2.12;95%CI,1.02,4.44)。ED的SAH就诊量和现场CT可用性均无法解释教学状况的影响。
约20分之一的SAH患者在ED就诊期间被漏诊。低急症患者误诊风险更高,这表明对于临床表现轻微的患者需要提高警惕。非教学医院的风险也更大,但这无法用ED中SAH的年度就诊量或CT的可及性来解释。