• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以住房为主导的城市更新对健康的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。

The health impacts of housing-led regeneration: a prospective controlled study.

作者信息

Thomson Hilary, Morrison David, Petticrew Mark

机构信息

MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):211-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049239.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2006.049239
PMID:17325397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2652910/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate self-reported changes in housing quality and health associated with housing-led area regeneration.

DESIGN

A prospective study over 1 year using structured interviews with 50 households who moved to new housing and with 50 matched controls who did not move.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Residents of two social rented housing schemes in the West of Scotland.

RESULTS

Small but not statistically significant increases in levels of "excellent" or "good" self-reported health status were found in both groups. Both intervention and control groups experienced reductions in problems related to warmth, but no significant change in how they felt about their house.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to conduct prospective controlled studies to evaluate the health effects of housing improvement using matched control groups. The absence of marked improvement in health after moving to new housing might be due to the small sample size or to the limited potential to improve health through this intervention alone.

摘要

研究目的

评估与以住房为主导的地区更新相关的住房质量和健康状况的自我报告变化。

设计

一项为期1年的前瞻性研究,对50户搬入新住房的家庭和50户未搬家的匹配对照组进行结构化访谈。

地点和参与者

苏格兰西部两个社会出租住房计划的居民。

结果

两组中自我报告的“优秀”或“良好”健康状况水平均有小幅但无统计学意义的提高。干预组和对照组与温暖相关的问题都有所减少,但他们对自己房子的感受没有显著变化。

结论

使用匹配对照组进行前瞻性对照研究以评估住房改善对健康的影响是可行的。搬入新住房后健康状况没有明显改善可能是由于样本量小或仅通过这种干预改善健康的潜力有限。

相似文献

1
The health impacts of housing-led regeneration: a prospective controlled study.以住房为主导的城市更新对健康的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):211-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049239.
2
Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes.改善住房对健康及相关社会经济成果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(2):CD008657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008657.pub2.
3
Health effects of neighborhood demolition and housing improvement: a prospective controlled study of 2 natural experiments in urban renewal.社区拆迁和住房改善对健康的影响:城市更新中 2 个自然实验的前瞻性对照研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e47-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301275. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
4
The SHARP study: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the short-term outcomes of housing and neighbourhood renewal.SHARP 研究:住房和社区更新短期结果的定量和定性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 17;9:415. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-415.
5
Neighbourhood demolition, relocation and health. A qualitative longitudinal study of housing-led urban regeneration in Glasgow, UK.社区拆除、搬迁与健康。英国格拉斯哥以住房为主导的城市更新的定性纵向研究。
Health Place. 2015 May;33:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Physical and mental health outcomes following housing improvements: evidence from the GoWell study.住房改善后的身心健康结果:来自GoWell研究的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jan;69(1):12-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204064. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
7
Protocol for a mixed methods study investigating the impact of investment in housing, regeneration and neighbourhood renewal on the health and wellbeing of residents: the GoWell programme.一项混合方法研究的方案,旨在调查投资住房、再生和社区更新对居民健康和福利的影响:GoWell 计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 May 11;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-41.
8
The effects on health of a publicly funded domestic heating programme: a prospective controlled study.一项由公共资金支持的家庭供暖计划对健康的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):12-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.074096. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
9
The effect of improving the thermal quality of cold housing on blood pressure and general health: a research note.改善寒冷房屋热质量对血压及总体健康的影响:一篇研究简报
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Sep;62(9):793-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.067835.
10
Association Between Structural Housing Repairs for Low-Income Homeowners and Neighborhood Crime.低收入房主的住房结构性维修与社区犯罪之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17067.

引用本文的文献

1
The short-term health and psychosocial impacts of domestic energy efficiency investments in low-income areas: a controlled before and after study.低收入地区家庭能源效率投资的短期健康和社会心理影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4075-4.
2
Can housing improvements cure or prevent the onset of health conditions over time in deprived areas?随着时间的推移,住房条件的改善能否治愈或预防贫困地区健康问题的发生?
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 28;15:1191. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2524-5.
3
Developing empirically supported theories of change for housing investment and health.为住房投资和健康制定经验支持的变革理论。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Economic analysis of the health impacts of housing improvement studies: a systematic review.住房改善研究对健康影响的经济分析:系统评价。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Oct;67(10):835-45. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-202124. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
5
A pre-and-post study of an urban renewal program in a socially disadvantaged neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia.澳大利亚悉尼一个社会弱势群体聚居区的城市更新计划的前后研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 12;12:521. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-521.
6
Exploring the relationships between housing, neighbourhoods and mental wellbeing for residents of deprived areas.探索贫困地区居民住房、社区与心理健康之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 18;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-48.
7
Material and meaningful homes: mental health impacts and psychosocial benefits of rehousing to new dwellings.有意义和有实质内容的居所:重新安置到新住所对心理健康的影响和心理社会获益。
Int J Public Health. 2011 Dec;56(6):597-607. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0275-3. Epub 2011 Aug 13.
8
Public health and advocacy: lessons from and for urban regeneration.公共卫生与宣传:城市更新的经验与借鉴
J Urban Health. 2010 Jan;87(1):5-7. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9412-1.
9
The health impacts of housing improvement: a systematic review of intervention studies from 1887 to 2007.住房改善对健康的影响:对1887年至2007年干预研究的系统评价
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S681-92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.143909.
10
Housing and health.住房与健康。
BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):434-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39133.558380.BE.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrofitting houses with insulation to reduce health inequalities: aims and methods of a clustered, randomised community-based trial.通过房屋隔热改造减少健康不平等:一项基于社区的整群随机试验的目标和方法
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.049. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
2
Evaluating the health effects of social interventions.评估社会干预措施对健康的影响。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):282-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.282.
3
Tackling inequalities in health: the need for building a systematic evidence base.应对健康不平等问题:建立系统性证据基础的必要性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Mar;57(3):162. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.3.162.
4
From local concern to randomized trial: the Watcombe Housing Project.从地方关注到随机试验:沃特科姆住房项目。
Health Expect. 2002 Jun;5(2):127-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00167.x.
5
Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies.住房改善对健康的影响:干预研究的系统评价
BMJ. 2001 Jul 28;323(7306):187-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.187.
6
Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.英国对SF-36第2版的评估。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan;53(1):46-50. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.1.46.
7
The short form 36 health status questionnaire: clues from the Oxford region's normative data about its usefulness in measuring health gain in population surveys.36项简易健康状况调查问卷:来自牛津地区标准数据的线索,关于其在人口调查中衡量健康收益的有用性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):102-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.102.