• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项由公共资金支持的家庭供暖计划对健康的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。

The effects on health of a publicly funded domestic heating programme: a prospective controlled study.

作者信息

Walker J, Mitchell R, Petticrew M, Platt S

机构信息

Research Unit in Health, Behaviour and Change (RUHBC), School of Clinical Sciences & Community Health, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):12-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.074096. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2008.074096
PMID:18801798
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of a publicly funded domestic heating programme on self-reported health.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective controlled study of 1281 households in Scotland receiving new central heating under a publicly funded initiative, and 1084 comparison households not receiving new heating. The main outcome measures were self-reported diagnosis of asthma, bronchitis, eczema, nasal allergy, heart disease, circulatory problems or high blood pressure; number of primary care encounters and hospital contacts in the past year; and SF-36 Health Survey scores.

RESULTS

Usable data were obtained from 61.4% of 3849 respondents originally recruited. Heating recipients reported higher scores on the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale (difference 2.51; 95% CI 0.67 to 4.37) and General Health scale (difference 2.57; 95% CI 0.90 to 4.34). They were less likely to report having received a first diagnosis of heart disease (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91) or high blood pressure (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.97), but the groups did not differ significantly in use of primary care or hospital services.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of central heating was associated with significant positive effects on general health and physical functioning; however, effect sizes were small. Evidence of a reduced risk of first diagnosis with heart disease or high blood pressure must be interpreted with caution, due to the self-reported nature of the outcomes, the limited time period and the failure to detect any difference in health service use.

摘要

目的

评估一项由公共资金资助的家庭供暖计划对自我报告健康状况的影响。

设计、背景与参与者:一项前瞻性对照研究,研究对象为苏格兰1281户通过公共资金资助项目获得新的中央供暖系统的家庭,以及1084户未获得新供暖系统的对照家庭。主要结局指标包括自我报告的哮喘、支气管炎、湿疹、鼻过敏、心脏病、循环系统问题或高血压诊断情况;过去一年中初级保健就诊次数和医院就诊次数;以及SF-36健康调查评分。

结果

从最初招募的3849名受访者中,61.4%的人获得了可用数据。接受供暖的人群在SF-36身体功能量表(差异为2.51;95%置信区间为0.67至4.37)和总体健康量表(差异为2.57;95%置信区间为0.90至4.34)上得分更高。他们报告首次诊断出心脏病(比值比0.69;95%置信区间为0.52至0.91)或高血压(比值比0.77;95%置信区间为0.61至0.97)的可能性较小,但两组在初级保健或医院服务的使用上没有显著差异。

结论

提供中央供暖与对总体健康和身体功能有显著的积极影响相关;然而,效应量较小。由于结局是自我报告性质、时间段有限且未发现卫生服务使用方面的任何差异,因此对于首次诊断心脏病或高血压风险降低的证据必须谨慎解读。

相似文献

1
The effects on health of a publicly funded domestic heating programme: a prospective controlled study.一项由公共资金支持的家庭供暖计划对健康的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):12-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.074096. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
2
Does usage of domestic heating influence internal environmental conditions and health?
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Oct;16(5):463-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki186. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
3
Fuel poverty increases risk of mould contamination, regardless of adult risk perception & ventilation in social housing properties.燃料贫困增加了霉菌污染的风险,而与成年人的风险感知和社会住房物业的通风无关。
Environ Int. 2015 Jun;79:115-29. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
4
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.为患有慢性疾病的不活跃成年人的运动推荐计划添加基于网络的行为支持:e-coachER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(63):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta24630.
5
The health impacts of housing-led regeneration: a prospective controlled study.以住房为主导的城市更新对健康的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):211-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049239.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
An out-of-court community-based programme to improve the health and well-being of young adult offenders: the Gateway RCT.一项改善青年罪犯健康和福利的庭外基于社区的方案:Gateway RCT。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Sep;12(7):1-111. doi: 10.3310/NTFW7364.
8
The short-term health and psychosocial impacts of domestic energy efficiency investments in low-income areas: a controlled before and after study.低收入地区家庭能源效率投资的短期健康和社会心理影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4075-4.
9
Enhancing ventilation in homes of children with asthma: cost-effectiveness study alongside randomised controlled trial.增强哮喘儿童家庭的通风:随机对照试验的成本效益研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Nov;61(592):e733-41. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X606645.
10
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of financial support interventions to reduce adverse health outcomes among households in fuel poverty in the United Kingdom.英国为减少燃料贫困家庭不良健康后果而采取的财政支持干预措施的有效性。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 May 10;7:100503. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100503. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Effectiveness of an Energy-Counseling Intervention in Reducing Energy Poverty: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Study in a Southern European City.能源咨询干预措施在减少能源贫困方面的有效性:来自南欧一城市的准实验研究证据。
J Urban Health. 2022 Jun;99(3):549-561. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00642-6. Epub 2022 May 27.
3
Applying the ROBINS-I tool to natural experiments: an example from public health.
应用 ROBINS-I 工具进行自然实验:来自公共卫生领域的一个例子。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 24;7(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0659-4.
4
Can housing improvements cure or prevent the onset of health conditions over time in deprived areas?随着时间的推移,住房条件的改善能否治愈或预防贫困地区健康问题的发生?
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 28;15:1191. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2524-5.
5
Between Extremes: Health Effects of Heat and Cold.极端之间:高温与低温对健康的影响
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Nov;123(11):A275-80. doi: 10.1289/ehp.123-A275.
6
The benefits of thermal clothing during winter in patients with heart failure: a pilot randomised controlled trial.冬季心力衰竭患者穿保暖衣物的益处:一项初步随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 29;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002799. Print 2013.
7
Social inequalities in health: measuring the contribution of housing deprivation and social interactions for Spain.社会不平等与健康:衡量住房剥夺和社会互动对西班牙的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Dec 14;11:77. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-77.
8
The SHARP study: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the short-term outcomes of housing and neighbourhood renewal.SHARP 研究:住房和社区更新短期结果的定量和定性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 17;9:415. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-415.