Suppr超能文献

一项混合方法研究的方案,旨在调查投资住房、再生和社区更新对居民健康和福利的影响:GoWell 计划。

Protocol for a mixed methods study investigating the impact of investment in housing, regeneration and neighbourhood renewal on the health and wellbeing of residents: the GoWell programme.

机构信息

Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 May 11;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-41.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little robust evidence to test the policy assumption that housing-led area regeneration strategies will contribute to health improvement and reduce social inequalities in health. The GoWell Programme has been designed to measure effects on health and wellbeing of multi-faceted regeneration interventions on residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the city of Glasgow, Scotland.

METHODS/DESIGN: This mixed methods study focused (initially) on 14 disadvantaged neighbourhoods experiencing regeneration. These were grouped by intervention into 5 categories for comparison. GoWell includes a pre-intervention householder survey (n = 6008) and three follow-up repeat-cross sectional surveys held at two or three year intervals (the main focus of this protocol) conducted alongside a nested longitudinal study of residents from 6 of those areas. Self-reported responses from face-to-face questionnaires are analysed along with various routinely produced ecological data and documentary sources to build a picture of the changes taking place, their cost and impacts on residents and communities. Qualitative methods include interviews and focus groups of residents, housing managers and other stakeholders exploring issues such as the neighbourhood context, potential pathways from regeneration to health, community engagement and empowerment.

DISCUSSION

Urban regeneration programmes are 'natural experiments.' They are complex interventions that may impact upon social determinants of population health and wellbeing. Measuring the effects of such interventions is notoriously challenging. GoWell compares the health and wellbeing effects of different approaches to regeneration, generates theory on pathways from regeneration to health and explores the attitudes and responses of residents and other stakeholders to neighbourhood change.

摘要

背景

几乎没有确凿的证据可以检验住房主导的区域再生策略将有助于改善健康状况和减少健康方面的社会不平等这一政策假设。GoWell 计划旨在衡量苏格兰格拉斯哥市弱势社区居民的多方面再生干预措施对健康和福利的影响。

方法/设计:这项混合方法研究最初集中在 14 个经历再生的弱势社区。这些社区按干预措施分组为 5 类进行比较。GoWell 包括在干预前对房主进行的调查(n=6008),以及在两到三年间隔进行的三次后续重复横断面调查(本方案的主要重点),同时对其中 6 个地区的居民进行嵌套纵向研究。从面对面问卷中分析自我报告的答复,以及各种常规生成的生态数据和文件来源,以了解正在发生的变化、它们的成本以及对居民和社区的影响。定性方法包括对居民、住房经理和其他利益相关者进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,探讨社区背景、从再生到健康的潜在途径、社区参与和赋权等问题。

讨论

城市再生计划是“自然实验”。它们是复杂的干预措施,可能会影响人口健康和福利的社会决定因素。衡量此类干预措施的效果极具挑战性。GoWell 比较了不同再生方法的健康和福利影响,生成了从再生到健康的途径理论,并探讨了居民和其他利益相关者对社区变化的态度和反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c55/2876178/4244f4f01659/1471-2288-10-41-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验