Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌临床试验中制药行业参与情况与试验结果之间的关联。

Association between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Peppercorn Jeffrey, Blood Emily, Winer Eric, Partridge Ann

机构信息

Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2007 Apr 1;109(7):1239-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22528.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 1992, pharmaceutical industry support has surpassed National Institutes of Health funding for clinical research in the United States. In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the impact of this shift in funding from public to private sponsors on the nature of published breast cancer clinical research.

METHODS

All published breast cancer clinical trials from 2003, 1998, and 1993 were reviewed from 10 select English-language medical journals to evaluate pharmaceutical involvement over time and the association between sponsorship, trial design, and results. Clinical studies that reported disease-specific outcomes from medical therapy for breast cancer were eligible for analysis. Pharmaceutical involvement was defined as reported pharmaceutical industry funding, provision of drug, and/or authorship for each publication.

RESULTS

In total, 140 eligible studies were identified, including 45 studies that were published in 1993, 39 studies that were published in 1998, and 56 studies that were published in 2003. Among those, 67 publications (48%) reported pharmaceutical industry involvement, 36 publications (26%) had at least >/=1 pharmaceutical industry author, And 100 publications (71%) were considered positive. Pharmaceutical involvement was identified in 44% of the studies published in 1993, in 38% of the studies published in 1998, and in 58% of the studies published in 2003. Pharmaceutical authorship was reported in 22% of the 1993 studies, in 21% of the 1998 studies, and in 34% of the 2003 studies. For studies that were published in 2003, those that reported pharmaceutical involvement were more likely to be positive (84% vs 54%; P = .02; Fisher exact test), to be single-arm studies (66% vs 33%; P = .03), and to evaluate metastatic disease (72% vs 46%; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmaceutical involvement in published clinical breast cancer research may affect study design, focus, and results. Further research is warranted, including analysis of unpublished studies, to evaluate the impact of increasing pharmaceutical industry involvement on clinical research.

摘要

背景

自1992年以来,制药行业对美国临床研究的资助已超过美国国立卫生研究院的资助。在本研究中,作者试图评估这种资助从公共赞助者向私人赞助者的转变对已发表的乳腺癌临床研究性质的影响。

方法

从10种精选的英文医学期刊中回顾了2003年、1998年和1993年发表的所有乳腺癌临床试验,以评估制药行业随时间的参与情况以及赞助、试验设计和结果之间的关联。报告乳腺癌药物治疗特定疾病结局的临床研究符合分析条件。制药行业的参与定义为报告的制药行业资助、药物提供和/或每篇出版物的作者身份。

结果

总共确定了140项符合条件的研究,包括1993年发表的45项研究、1998年发表的39项研究和2003年发表的56项研究。其中,67篇出版物(48%)报告了制药行业的参与,36篇出版物(26%)至少有≥1名制药行业作者,100篇出版物(71%)被认为是阳性的。在1993年发表的研究中有44%发现有制药行业参与,在1998年发表的研究中有38%,在2003年发表的研究中有58%。在1993年的研究中有22%报告有制药行业作者,在1998年的研究中有21%,在2003年的研究中有34%。对于2003年发表的研究,那些报告有制药行业参与的研究更有可能是阳性的(84%对54%;P = 0.02;Fisher精确检验),更有可能是单臂研究(66%对33%;P = 0.03),并且更有可能评估转移性疾病(72%对46%;P = 0.06)。

结论

制药行业参与已发表的临床乳腺癌研究可能会影响研究设计、重点和结果。有必要进行进一步研究,包括对未发表研究的分析,以评估制药行业参与增加对临床研究的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验