Abbaszadegan Morteza, Mayer Brooke K, Ryu Hodon, Nwachuku Nena
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 875306, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5306, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 1;41(3):971-7. doi: 10.1021/es061517z.
The focus of coagulation as a water treatment process is shifting to accommodate recent regulatory additions that strive to balance the risks between microbial and chemical contamination of drinking water. In this work, enhanced coagulation using increased ferric chloride dose and/or pH adjustment was evaluated for removal efficacy of viruses on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Contaminant Candidate List (CCL), their surrogates, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Jar tests demonstrated that optimal DOC removal was achieved using 40 mg/L FeCl3 at a pH between 5 and 6. Under these conditions, bench-scale testing resulted in a maximum removal of 2.58 log units of adenovirus type 4, 2.50 log units of feline calicivirus, 2.32 log units of MS2, 1.75 log units of PRD1, 1.52 log units of phi-X174, 2.49 log units of fr, and 56% of DOC. The trend in virus removals (MS2 and fr > PRD1 and phi-X174) was consistent between bench- and pilot-scale testing; however, pilot-plant removals exceeded bench-scale removals. Feline calicivirus was more efficiently removed than the bacteriophages, thereby suggesting potential for the bacteriophages as suitable surrogates, with MS2 and fr being more representative and PRD1 and phi-X174 (which were removed to a lesser extent) more conservative. The bacteriophages do not appear to be appropriate surrogates for adenovirus.
作为一种水处理工艺,混凝的重点正在发生转变,以适应最近的监管要求,这些要求致力于平衡饮用水微生物污染和化学污染之间的风险。在这项工作中,评估了增加氯化铁剂量和/或调节pH值的强化混凝对美国环境保护局(USEPA)污染物候选清单(CCL)上的病毒、其替代物以及溶解有机碳(DOC)的去除效果。烧杯试验表明,在pH值为5至6的条件下,使用40 mg/L的FeCl3可实现最佳的DOC去除。在这些条件下,中试规模测试实现了对4型腺病毒的最大去除率为2.58对数单位、猫杯状病毒为2.50对数单位、MS2为2.32对数单位、PRD1为1.75对数单位、phi-X174为1.52对数单位、fr为2.49对数单位,以及56%的DOC。中试和试验规模测试之间病毒去除率的趋势(MS2和fr > PRD1和phi-X174)是一致的;然而,试验工厂的去除率超过了中试规模的去除率。猫杯状病毒比噬菌体去除效率更高,这表明噬菌体有作为合适替代物的潜力,其中MS2和fr更具代表性,而PRD1和phi-X174(去除程度较低)更保守。噬菌体似乎不是腺病毒的合适替代物。