• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应冲突的任务特定分辨率的证据。

Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.

作者信息

Kiesel Andrea, Kunde Wilfried, Hoffmann Joachim

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):800-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03194000.

DOI:10.3758/bf03194000
PMID:17328376
Abstract

When a target requires different responses to a relevant and to an irrelevant task in a task-switching paradigm, there is response conflict. This target-induced response conflict was combined with conflict caused by a subliminally presented prime presented prior to the target. We found that target-related conflict reduced prime-induced conflict effects within the same trial However, target-related conflict modified prime-related conflict effects according to the irrelevant stimulus-response (S-R) rule, but not according to the relevant S-R rule. Moreover, trial-to-trial modulations of the target congruency effect were observed in task repetition trials, but not in task switch trials. These results indicate that conflict resolution mechanisms, at least under the present circumstances, operate in a strictly task-specific manner.

摘要

当一个目标在任务切换范式中对相关任务和不相关任务需要不同反应时,就会出现反应冲突。这种目标诱发的反应冲突与目标之前呈现的阈下启动刺激所引起的冲突相结合。我们发现,在同一试验中,与目标相关的冲突会降低启动刺激诱发的冲突效应。然而,与目标相关的冲突是根据不相关的刺激-反应(S-R)规则而非相关的S-R规则来改变与启动刺激相关的冲突效应的。此外,在任务重复试验中观察到了目标一致性效应的逐次试验调制,但在任务切换试验中未观察到。这些结果表明,至少在当前情况下,冲突解决机制以严格的任务特定方式运行。

相似文献

1
Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.反应冲突的任务特定分辨率的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):800-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03194000.
2
Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.刺激-反应对应效应的顺序调节取决于对反应冲突的意识。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):198-205. doi: 10.3758/bf03196485.
3
Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.通过竞争规则抑制解决任务转换中的任务规则不和谐。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):992-1002. doi: 10.1037/a0019761.
4
A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming.阈下启动中的任务难度假象。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1276-83. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1276.
5
Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.任务切换中与线索无关的特定任务表征:来自逆向抑制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):892-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.892.
6
Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.两种西蒙任务的比较:基于连贯运动感知的冲突解决的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):921-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.034. Epub 2006 May 3.
7
Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?考虑侧翼任务中的序列试验效应:冲突适应还是联想启动?
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1260-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03193270.
8
Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.任务切换中任务冲突的电生理相关性。
Brain Res. 2008 Apr 8;1203:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.092. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
9
Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.阈下字母启动中的返回抑制
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
10
Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.线索类型操作区分了两种任务集抑制:逆向抑制和竞争规则抑制。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):625-39. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0663-z. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Local and global control adjustments to stimulus-based task conflict in task switching.任务切换中基于刺激的任务冲突的局部和全局控制调整。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):963-977. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200442. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context.

本文引用的文献

1
Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks.跨空间维度和任务的对应效应的顺序调制。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):356-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03193413.
2
Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task.数字判断的掩蔽启动效应取决于启动刺激的有效性和任务。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jan;33(1):29-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03195295.
3
Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update.冲突监测与前扣带回皮层:最新进展
注意调整在启动任务中:控制策略取决于语境。
Cogn Process. 2023 Feb;24(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01117-x. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Rethinking attentional reset: Task sets determine the boundaries of adaptive control.重新思考注意力重置:任务集决定适应性控制的边界。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jun;75(6):1171-1185. doi: 10.1177/17470218211047424. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Is there evidence for cross-domain congruency sequence effect? A replication of Kan . (2013).是否存在跨领域一致性序列效应的证据?对Kan(2013年)的一项重复研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 3;8(3):191353. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191353.
6
Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.调整对反应冲突的选择性注意——控制知觉冲突、目标-干扰物身份以及与一致性序列效应有关的一致性水平序列。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2531-2550. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02294-1. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Multiple Routes to Control in the Prime-Target Task: Congruence Sequence Effects Emerge Due to Modulation of Irrelevant Prime Activity and Utilization of Temporal Order Information.在首要目标任务中实现控制的多种途径:由于无关启动刺激活动的调制和时间顺序信息的利用,出现了一致性序列效应。
J Cogn. 2021 Mar 10;4(1):18. doi: 10.5334/joc.143.
8
Combine performance, draft position and playing position are poor predictors of player career outcomes in the Australian Football League.在澳大利亚足球联赛中,球员的表现、选秀顺位和场上位置是预测其职业生涯结果的不良指标。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 17;15(6):e0234400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234400. eCollection 2020.
9
Mood state and conflict adaptation: an update and a diffusion model analysis.心境状态与冲突适应:更新与扩散模型分析。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):322-344. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01258-3. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks.测量冲突任务中的自适应控制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;23(9):769-783. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Dec;8(12):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003.
4
Conflict, consciousness, and control.冲突、意识与控制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.006.
5
Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.刺激-反应对应效应的顺序调节取决于对反应冲突的意识。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):198-205. doi: 10.3758/bf03196485.
6
Different time courses for visual perception and action priming.视觉感知和动作启动的不同时间进程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6275-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931489100. Epub 2003 Apr 28.
7
Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.西蒙任务中基于位置的反应激活的控制:行为学和电生理学证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Dec;28(6):1345-63. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345.
8
Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict.冲突对认知和大脑的影响。
Neuroimage. 2003 Jan;18(1):42-57. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1319.
9
A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration.刺激-反应持续时间的西蒙效应。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Apr;55(2):581-92. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000433.
10
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.冲突监测与认知控制。
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624.