Altmann Erik M
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):892-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.892.
The compound-cue model of cognitive control in task switching explains switch cost in terms of a switch of task cues rather than of a switch of tasks. The present study asked whether the model generalizes to Lag 2 repetition cost (also known as backward inhibition), a related effect in which the switch from B to A in ABA task sequences is costlier than is the same switch in CBA task sequences. The model suggests that Lag 2 repetition cost should be absent from A'BA task sequences, in which A' and A are different cues for the same task. The cost is robust on such sequences, which suggests that cue-independent, task-specific representations are necessary for explaining task-switching performance and that the compound-cue model has limited explanatory power.
任务切换中认知控制的复合线索模型用任务线索的切换而非任务的切换来解释切换代价。本研究探讨该模型是否适用于滞后2重复代价(也称为反向抑制),这是一种相关效应,即在ABA任务序列中从B切换到A比在CBA任务序列中的相同切换代价更高。该模型表明,在A'BA任务序列中不应存在滞后2重复代价,其中A'和A是同一任务的不同线索。但在这样的序列中这种代价很显著,这表明独立于线索的、特定于任务的表征对于解释任务切换表现是必要的,且复合线索模型的解释力有限。