• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生的专家型知识结构与诊断成功几率的增加相关。

Expert-type knowledge structure in medical students is associated with increased odds of diagnostic success.

作者信息

McLaughlin Kevin, Coderre Sylvain, Mortis Garth, Mandin Henry

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2007 Winter;19(1):35-41. doi: 10.1080/10401330709336621.

DOI:10.1080/10401330709336621
PMID:17330997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relation between knowledge structure and diagnostic performance is unclear. Similarly, variables affecting knowledge structure are poorly understood.

PURPOSE

The 1st objective was to examine the relation between concepts in knowledge structure and diagnostic performance. The 2nd objective was to examine the relation between the use of diagnostic schemes by small-group preceptors and knowledge structure of medical students.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of 1st-year medical students in 4 clinical presentations: hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and metabolic alkalosis. The 1st dependent variable was diagnostic success with the number of expert-type concepts in knowledge structure (determined by concept sorting), diagnostic scheme use by preceptors, and clinical presentation as independent variables. The 2nd dependent variable was the number of expert-type concepts in knowledge structure with diagnostic scheme use by preceptors and clinical presentation as independent variables. Data were analyzed using multiple logistic and linear regression.

RESULTS

Thirty 1st-year medical students participated. After adjusting for clinical presentation and scheme use by preceptors, the number of expert-type concepts in knowledge structure was associated with increased odds of diagnostic success (odds ratio 1.18 [1.03, 1.35], p = .016). After adjustment for clinical presentation, scheme use by preceptors was associated with increased number of expert-type concepts in knowledge structure (2.22 vs. 1.86, p = .01, d = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of expert-type concepts in knowledge structure is associated with increased odds of diagnostic success. Scheme use by small-group preceptors is associated with an increased number of expert-type concepts in knowledge structure.

摘要

背景

知识结构与诊断表现之间的关系尚不清楚。同样,影响知识结构的变量也鲜为人知。

目的

第一个目标是研究知识结构中的概念与诊断表现之间的关系。第二个目标是研究小组带教老师使用诊断方案与医学生知识结构之间的关系。

方法

这是一项针对一年级医学生的横断面研究,涉及4种临床表现:低钠血症、高钾血症、代谢性酸中毒和代谢性碱中毒。第一个因变量是诊断成功率,将知识结构中专家型概念的数量(通过概念分类确定)、带教老师使用的诊断方案以及临床表现作为自变量。第二个因变量是知识结构中专家型概念的数量,将带教老师使用的诊断方案以及临床表现作为自变量。使用多元逻辑回归和线性回归分析数据。

结果

30名一年级医学生参与了研究。在对临床表现和带教老师使用的方案进行调整后,知识结构中专家型概念的数量与诊断成功几率的增加相关(优势比为1.18 [1.03, 1.35],p = .016)。在对临床表现进行调整后,带教老师使用的方案与知识结构中专家型概念数量的增加相关(2.22对1.86,p = .01,d = 0.23)。

结论

知识结构中专家型概念的数量与诊断成功几率的增加相关。小组带教老师使用方案与知识结构中专家型概念数量的增加相关。

相似文献

1
Expert-type knowledge structure in medical students is associated with increased odds of diagnostic success.医学生的专家型知识结构与诊断成功几率的增加相关。
Teach Learn Med. 2007 Winter;19(1):35-41. doi: 10.1080/10401330709336621.
2
Qualitative differences in knowledge structure are associated with diagnostic performance in medical students.知识结构的定性差异与医学生的诊断表现有关。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Dec;14(5):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9149-8. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
3
Can concept sorting provide a reliable, valid and sensitive measure of medical knowledge structure?概念分类能否提供一种对医学知识结构可靠、有效且敏感的测量方法?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Aug;12(3):265-78. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-6029-3. Epub 2006 Oct 28.
4
Medical student acquisition of clinical working knowledge.医学生临床工作知识的习得
Teach Learn Med. 2008 Jan-Mar;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/10401330701542552.
5
[Methods for teaching problem-solving in medical schools].[医学院校中解决问题的教学方法]
Educ Med Salud. 1984;18(1):46-61.
6
Do underrepresented minority medical students differ from non-minority students in problem-solving ability?代表性不足的少数族裔医学生在解决问题的能力上与非少数族裔学生有差异吗?
Teach Learn Med. 2001 Spring;13(2):86-91. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1302_3.
7
Current trends in developing medical students' critical thinking abilities.培养医学生批判性思维能力的当前趋势。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Jul;24(7):341-55. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70131-1.
8
[The best way to learn consultation skills is through tutoring in clinical situations. Experiences from a course in Gothenburg].[学习会诊技能的最佳方法是通过临床情境中的辅导。来自哥德堡一门课程的经验]
Lakartidningen. 2001 Jul 11;98(28-29):3238-44.
9
Impact of a 1-day ophthalmology experience on medical students.为期一天的眼科见习经历对医学生的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec;113(12):2307-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.066. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
10
Teaching first or teaching last: does the timing matter in simulation-based surgical scenarios?先教后教:模拟手术场景中的时间安排重要吗?
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for developing pre-clinical medical students' clinical reasoning based on illness script formation: a systematic review.基于疾病脚本形成培养医学预科学生临床推理能力的策略:系统评价。
Korean J Med Educ. 2022 Mar;34(1):49-61. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2022.219. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
How to Keep Training-After Residency Training.如何在住院医师培训后保持培训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1524-1528. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07240-3. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
What do otolaryngologists want to learn? An educational targeted needs assessment study.
耳鼻喉科医生想学什么?一项有针对性的教育需求评估研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May-Jun;86(3):287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
Current trends in developing medical students' critical thinking abilities.培养医学生批判性思维能力的当前趋势。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Jul;24(7):341-55. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70131-1.
5
Using a conceptual framework during learning attenuates the loss of expert-type knowledge structure.在学习过程中使用概念框架可减少专家型知识结构的损失。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Jul 18;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-37.