Williams Reed G, Klamen Debra L, Hoffman Rebecca M
Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois 62794-9638, USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2008 Jan-Mar;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/10401330701542552.
Working knowledge of physicians manifests as a combination of diagnostic pattern recognition and clinical data interpretation (analytic fact checking).
The purpose was to study medical student acquisition of these abilities as a function of years of medical training/experience.
A cross-sectional study involving students who had completed 0, 1, 2, and 3 years of medical school. All students at all levels of training took the same tests of diagnostic pattern recognition and clinical data interpretation. Percent correct scores were calculated and used to estimate learning curves. A cohort of family physicians also took the test to provide a benchmark.
Student diagnostic pattern recognition and clinical data interpretation ability demonstrated a steady upward growth curve but leveled off in Year 3. Diagnostic pattern recognition performance was consistently higher than clinical data interpretation performance. The rate of diagnostic performance gain with training and experience was also higher.
Medical students acquired diagnostic pattern recognition ability and all years of medical training contributed. The rate of clinical data interpretation performance improvement was slower, and the absolute performance level was lower. What was surprising was the lower rate of improvement in diagnostic pattern recognition and clinical data interpretation performance for students during their 1st year of clinical training. Students' understanding of findings and their relationships to disease processes may be affected by their limited patient experience.
医生的实用知识表现为诊断模式识别和临床数据解读(分析性事实核查)的结合。
本研究旨在探讨医学生这些能力的获得情况与医学培训/经验年限的关系。
一项横断面研究,涉及已完成0年、1年、2年和3年医学院学习的学生。所有不同培训阶段的学生都参加相同的诊断模式识别和临床数据解读测试。计算正确得分百分比并用于估计学习曲线。一组家庭医生也参加了测试以提供基准。
学生的诊断模式识别和临床数据解读能力呈现出稳定的上升曲线,但在第3年趋于平稳。诊断模式识别表现始终高于临床数据解读表现。随着培训和经验积累,诊断表现的提升率也更高。
医学生获得了诊断模式识别能力,医学培训的各年份均有贡献。临床数据解读表现的提升速度较慢,且绝对表现水平较低。令人惊讶的是,学生在临床培训的第1年,诊断模式识别和临床数据解读表现的提升率较低。学生对检查结果及其与疾病过程关系的理解可能受到其有限的患者经验的影响。