Suppr超能文献

彩色多普勒超声检查是鉴别儿童正常与异常阑尾的好方法吗?

Is colour Doppler sonography a good method to differentiate normal and abnormal appendices in children?

作者信息

Baldisserotto M, Peletti A B

机构信息

Hospital da Criança Conceição, Ministério da Saúde, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2007 Apr;62(4):365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.009. Epub 2007 Jan 30.

Abstract

AIM

To determine whether colour Doppler sonograms can be used to differentiate between the normal appendix and acute appendicitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study examined 50 consecutive children with suspected appendicitis using grey-scale and colour Doppler US. Appendicitis was diagnosed when the appendix diameter was greater than 6 mm. Blood flow on the appendiceal wall was measured and classified as non-existent (0 pixels), low (1-2), moderate (3-4) or abundant (>4). Likelihood ratios were calculated for each of these levels. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by pathological findings, and ruled out by clinical follow-up or pathological findings.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients examined, 24 had appendicitis and 26 had a normal appendix. For 25 of the patients with a normal appendix, appendicitis was ruled out by clinical follow-up, and for one patient, by pathological findings. The abnormal appendix was identified in all patients with appendicitis. In the group of 26 patients without appendicitis, the normal appendix was visualized in 23 cases, one of which was false positive (100% sensitivity, 96% specificity). Abnormal appendices showed moderate to abundant flow in 62% of the cases and non-existent or low flow in 38%. Normal appendices had non-existent or low flow in 82% of the cases, but moderate or abundant in 18%. Significant differences were only found when the number of pixels was >4.

CONCLUSION

Although the vascularity of normal and inflamed appendices may be different, this difference was not a good diagnostic indicator of appendicitis.

摘要

目的

确定彩色多普勒超声检查能否用于鉴别正常阑尾与急性阑尾炎。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究对50例疑似阑尾炎患儿进行了灰阶超声和彩色多普勒超声检查。当阑尾直径大于6mm时诊断为阑尾炎。测量阑尾壁上的血流并分类为无(0像素)、低(1 - 2)、中(3 - 4)或丰富(>4)。计算这些血流水平各自的似然比。急性阑尾炎的诊断经病理结果证实,通过临床随访或病理结果排除。

结果

在检查的50例患者中,24例患有阑尾炎,26例阑尾正常。25例阑尾正常的患者经临床随访排除阑尾炎,1例经病理结果排除。所有阑尾炎患者均识别出异常阑尾。在26例无阑尾炎的患者组中,23例可见正常阑尾,其中1例为假阳性(敏感性100%,特异性96%)。62%的异常阑尾显示中等到丰富的血流,38%显示无或低血流。82%的正常阑尾显示无或低血流,但18%显示中或丰富血流。仅当像素数>4时发现显著差异。

结论

虽然正常阑尾与发炎阑尾的血管分布可能不同,但这种差异并非阑尾炎的良好诊断指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验