Xu Yingding, Jeffrey R Brooke, Shin Lewis K, DiMaio Michael A, Olcott Eric W
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA.
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA, Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Oct;35(10):2129-38. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.11064. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
To test the hypothesis that continuous intramural vascular signal measuring at least 3 mm on color Doppler imaging is highly specific for appendicitis in patients with diagnostically borderline-size appendices.
Two blinded observers independently reviewed color Doppler images of the appendix in 94 consecutive patients who had undergone sonography for suspected appendicitis and whose appendices were of diagnostically borderline size (6-8 mm maximum outer diameter). Intramural vascular flow on color Doppler images was classified as absent, type 1 (only punctate and dispersed signal), or type 2 (continuous linear or curvilinear signal measuring at least 3.0 mm in long- or short-axis views). Histopathologic examination and clinical follow-up served as reference standards. Proportions were assessed by the exact binomial test.
Of the 94 patients, 33 (35.1%) had type 1 flow (of whom 5 [15.2%] had appendicitis); 23 (24.5%) had type 2 flow (of whom 20 [87.0%] had appendicitis); and 38 (40.4%) had absent flow (of whom 10 [26.3%] had appendicitis). The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio of type 2 flow as an indicator of appendicitis were 57.1%, 94.9%, and 24.9 (P< .001), respectively; the corresponding values for type 1 flow as an indicator of normal appendices were and 47.5%, 85.7%, and 5.4 (P = .002).
Continuous intramural linear or curvilinear signal measuring at least 3 mm on color Doppler imaging is a highly specific, although relatively insensitive, sign of acute appendicitis in noncompressible appendices of diagnostically borderline size (6-8 mm).
检验以下假设,即在彩色多普勒成像中,壁内血管信号连续且长度至少为3 mm,对于诊断性边缘大小阑尾的患者,该信号对阑尾炎具有高度特异性。
两名盲法观察者独立回顾了94例连续患者的阑尾彩色多普勒图像,这些患者因疑似阑尾炎接受了超声检查,且阑尾的诊断性边缘大小(最大外径6 - 8 mm)。彩色多普勒图像上的壁内血流分为无血流、1型(仅有点状和散在信号)或2型(在长轴或短轴视图中连续的线性或曲线信号,长度至少为3.0 mm)。组织病理学检查和临床随访作为参考标准。比例通过确切二项式检验进行评估。
94例患者中,33例(35.1%)有1型血流(其中5例[15.2%]患有阑尾炎);23例(24.5%)有2型血流(其中20例[87.0%]患有阑尾炎);38例(40.4%)无血流(其中10例[26.3%]患有阑尾炎)。作为阑尾炎指标的2型血流的敏感性、特异性和比值比分别为57.1%、94.9%和24.9(P <.001);作为正常阑尾指标的1型血流的相应值分别为47.5%、85.7%和5.4(P =.002)。
在彩色多普勒成像中,壁内连续的线性或曲线信号长度至少为3 mm,对于诊断性边缘大小(6 - 8 mm)的不可压缩阑尾,是急性阑尾炎的高度特异性但相对不敏感的征象。