Ruggero Camilo J, Chelminski Iwona, Young Diane, Zimmerman Mark
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2007 Dec;104(1-3):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.035. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
Significant research has looked at the psychosocial impairment associated with bipolar I disorder and major depressive disorder. Far less is known about the impact of bipolar II disorder. The present study assessed the social and work impairment associated with bipolar II disorder and whether these are more or less severe than those associated with bipolar I disorder or major depressive disorder.
Psychiatric outpatients with bipolar II disorder (n=89), bipolar I disorder (n=45) and major depressive disorder (n=1251) were assessed cross-sectionally by highly trained raters using semi-structured interviews. Participants were in a major depressive episode. Groups were compared on a series of indicators of psychosocial functioning.
Bipolar I and II disorder were associated with greater absenteeism from work due to psychopathology compared to major depressive disorder. The bipolar disorders also had higher rates of hospitalization and suicide attempts. Bipolar II disorder had fewer hospitalization than bipolar I disorder which may have led to slightly less severe work impairment. Both conditions had similar rates of serious suicide attempts.
The study was cross-sectional and retrospective. Furthermore, the sample consisted of outpatients seeking treatment, limiting generalizability to other settings.
Bipolar II disorder is associated with serious work impairment and a high number of serious suicide attempts. The level of impairment is more similar than it is different from that associated with bipolar I disorder. Clinicians would be mistaken to presume that the "softer" bipolar spectrum, specifically bipolar II disorder, is less impairing than bipolar I disorder.
大量研究关注了与双相 I 型障碍和重度抑郁症相关的心理社会损害。关于双相 II 型障碍的影响所知甚少。本研究评估了与双相 II 型障碍相关的社交和工作损害,以及这些损害与双相 I 型障碍或重度抑郁症相比是更严重还是更轻微。
使用半结构化访谈,由训练有素的评估者对患有双相 II 型障碍(n = 89)、双相 I 型障碍(n = 45)和重度抑郁症(n = 1251)的精神科门诊患者进行横断面评估。参与者处于重度抑郁发作期。在一系列心理社会功能指标上对各组进行比较。
与重度抑郁症相比,双相 I 型和 II 型障碍因精神病理学导致的工作缺勤更多。双相障碍的住院率和自杀未遂率也更高。双相 II 型障碍的住院次数比双相 I 型障碍少,这可能导致工作损害略轻。两种情况的严重自杀未遂率相似。
该研究是横断面研究且具有回顾性。此外,样本由寻求治疗的门诊患者组成,限制了对其他环境的普遍性。
双相 II 型障碍与严重的工作损害和大量严重自杀未遂相关。损害程度与双相 I 型障碍相关的损害程度更为相似而非不同。临床医生若认为“较轻”的双相谱系,特别是双相 II 型障碍,造成的损害比双相 I 型障碍小,那就错了。