Suppr超能文献

抑郁症诊断量表:一种用于诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版重度抑郁症的自评量表。

The Diagnostic Inventory for Depression: a self-report scale to diagnose DSM-IV major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Zimmerman Mark, Sheeran Thomas, Young Diane

机构信息

Rhode Island Hospital, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2004 Jan;60(1):87-110. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10207.

Abstract

In this report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we describe the development and validation of the Diagnostic Inventory for Depression (DID), a new self-report scale designed to assess the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) symptom inclusion criteria for a major depressive episode, assess psychosocial impairment due to depression, and evaluate subjective quality of life. A large sample of 626 psychiatric outpatients completed the DID and were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). The measure's test-retest reliability, discriminant and convergent validity, and sensitivity to clinical change were investigated. The DID subscales achieved high levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The DID was more highly correlated with another self-report measure of depression than with measures of anxiety, substance use problems, eating disorders, and somatization, thereby supporting the convergent and discriminant validity of the scale. The DID also was highly correlated with interviewer ratings of the severity of depression and psychosocial functioning, and DID symptom severity scores were significantly different in depressed patients with mild, moderate, and severe levels of depression. The DID was a valid measure of symptom change. Finally, the DID was significantly associated with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder.

摘要

在这份来自罗德岛改善诊断评估与服务方法(MIDAS)项目的报告中,我们描述了抑郁诊断量表(DID)的开发与验证过程。该量表是一种新的自评量表,旨在评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV;美国精神病学协会,1994)中重度抑郁发作的症状纳入标准,评估抑郁导致的心理社会功能损害,并评估主观生活质量。626名精神科门诊患者的大样本完成了DID量表测试,并接受了DSM-IV结构化临床访谈(SCID)。我们对该量表的重测信度、区分效度和聚合效度以及对临床变化的敏感性进行了研究。DID分量表具有较高的内部一致性和重测信度。与焦虑、物质使用问题、进食障碍和躯体化测量相比,DID与另一种抑郁自评量表的相关性更高,从而支持了该量表的聚合效度和区分效度。DID与访谈者对抑郁严重程度和心理社会功能的评分也高度相关,并且在轻度、中度和重度抑郁的患者中,DID症状严重程度得分存在显著差异。DID是症状变化的有效测量工具。最后,DID与重度抑郁症的诊断显著相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验